Jonathan Goodwin

499 citations
23 papers · 397 · h-index 12

Impact in

Papers in

Jonathan Goodwin

22 papers receiving 392 citations

Peers

Jonathan Goodwin
Comparison fields: 5 of 60
  • Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging 231
  • Biophysics 28
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 81
  • Neurology 29
  • Neurology 14
Replace Thies H. Jochimsen with:
Thies H. Jochimsen Germany
Matthias Guenther Germany
Jae‐Yong Han South Korea
Friedrich Wetterling Ireland
René‐Maxime Gracien Germany
Alexander Seiler Germany
Wendy W. Ni United States
Baohong Wen China
Jonathan Goodwin relative to Thies H. Jochimsen Germany Thies H. Jochimsen's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Thies H. Jochimsen · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Jonathan Goodwin

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Jonathan Goodwin's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jonathan Goodwin with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jonathan Goodwin more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Jonathan Goodwin

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jonathan Goodwin. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jonathan Goodwin. The network helps show where Jonathan Goodwin may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Jonathan Goodwin, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Jonathan Goodwin Line = papers co-authored together Jonathan Goodwin links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 23 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201586
2 201166
3 201425
4 201324
5 201523
6 200922
7 201521
8 202119
9 202117
10 201414
11 201414
12 201213
13 201611
14 202110
15 20149
16 20127
17 20234
18 20214
19 20223
20 20112

About Jonathan Goodwin

Jonathan Goodwin is a scholar working on Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, Biophysics, Cognitive Neuroscience and Radiation, having authored 23 papers that have together received 397 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Advanced MRI Techniques and Applications (11 papers), Electron Spin Resonance Studies (3 papers), Advanced Radiotherapy Techniques (2 papers), Advanced Neuroimaging Techniques and Applications (2 papers), Medical Imaging Techniques and Applications (2 papers), Functional Brain Connectivity Studies (2 papers), Acute Ischemic Stroke Management (2 papers) and Lanthanide and Transition Metal Complexes (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging (231 citations), Biophysics (28 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (81 citations), Neurology (29 citations) and Neurology (14 citations). Jonathan Goodwin has collaborated with scholars based in Japan, Australia and United States. Frequent co-authors include Makoto Sasaki, Satomi Higuchi, Fumio Yamashita, Kohsuke Kudo, Ikuko Uwano, Laura M. Parkes, Akira Ogawa, Vanessa Sluming, Hedley Emsley and Kenji Ito. Their work appears in journals such as Magnetic Resonance in Medical Sciences, NeuroImage, Magnetic Resonance in Medicine, Physics and Imaging in Radiation Oncology and NMR in Biomedicine.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact