Jonathan E. Smith

26 papers receiving 674 citations

Peers

Jonathan E. Smith
Comparison fields: 5 of 100
  • Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management 187
  • Information Systems and Management 120
  • Applied Psychology 68
  • Social Psychology 220
  • General Decision Sciences 18
Replace Mary C. Kern with:
Mary C. Kern United States
Mary T. Curren United States
Karen J. Maher United States
A. Dwayne Ball United States
Élodie Gentina France
Richard R. Tansey United States
Richard Buda United States
Stanley L. Saxton United States
Kyle J. Emich United States
William C. Gaidis United States
Jonathan E. Smith relative to Mary C. Kern United States Mary C. Kern's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Mary C. Kern · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Jonathan E. Smith

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Jonathan E. Smith's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jonathan E. Smith with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jonathan E. Smith more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Jonathan E. Smith

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jonathan E. Smith. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jonathan E. Smith. The network helps show where Jonathan E. Smith may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 13 scholars most cited alongside Jonathan E. Smith, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Jonathan E. Smith Line = papers co-authored together Jonathan E. Smith links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 26 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1980145
2 1983127
3 1990120
4 199296
5 201578
6 198256
7 198339
8 200918
9 197613
10 201411
11 19969
12 19859
13 20019
14 20127
15 19826
16 20096
17 19826
18
Co-Charismatic Leadership: Critical Perspectives on Spirituality, Ethics and Leadership
20145
19 20125
20 20215

About Jonathan E. Smith

Jonathan E. Smith is a scholar working on Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management, Information Systems and Management, Social Psychology, Management of Technology and Innovation and Demography, having authored 26 papers that have together received 786 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Ethics in Business and Education (4 papers), Management and Marketing Education (3 papers), Workplace Spirituality and Leadership (3 papers), Job Satisfaction and Organizational Behavior (3 papers), Behavioral Health and Interventions (2 papers), Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment (2 papers), Religion, Spirituality, and Psychology (2 papers) and Management and Organizational Studies (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management (187 citations), Information Systems and Management (120 citations), Applied Psychology (68 citations), Social Psychology (220 citations) and General Decision Sciences (18 citations). Jonathan E. Smith has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Malaysia. Frequent co-authors include Robert G. Lord, Abraham Tesser, Paul R. Murphy, James M. Daley, David R. Shaffer, Simon J. Robinson, Braja M. Das, Robert J. Pleban, Carey J. Hardaway and Kenneth P. Carson. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, Academy of Management Review, Journal of Management, Journal of Experimental Social Psychology and Analytical Letters.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact