Jonathan D. Horowitz

683 citations
6 papers · 402 · h-index 5

Impact in

Papers in

Jonathan D. Horowitz

6 papers receiving 383 citations

Peers

Jonathan D. Horowitz
Comparison fields: 5 of 73
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 212
  • Applied Psychology 60
  • Human-Computer Interaction 45
  • Clinical Psychology 167
  • Sensory Systems 32
Replace Jordi Llabrés with:
Jordi Llabrés Spain
Trishul Devineni United States
Sara Scheveneels Belgium
Simon Neumer Germany
Benjamin Trachik United States
Joni Kettunen Finland
Joan Ribas‐Sabaté Spain
Shannan M. Edwards United States
Eva Zysk United Kingdom
Jonathan D. Horowitz relative to Jordi Llabrés Spain Jordi Llabrés's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2.7×
Jordi Llabrés · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Jonathan D. Horowitz

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Jonathan D. Horowitz's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jonathan D. Horowitz with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jonathan D. Horowitz more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Jonathan D. Horowitz

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jonathan D. Horowitz. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jonathan D. Horowitz. The network helps show where Jonathan D. Horowitz may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 12 scholars most cited alongside Jonathan D. Horowitz, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Jonathan D. Horowitz Line = papers co-authored together Jonathan D. Horowitz links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

6 of 6 papers shown

About Jonathan D. Horowitz

Jonathan D. Horowitz is a scholar working on Cognitive Neuroscience, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Clinical Psychology, Psychiatry and Mental health and Physiology, having authored 6 papers that have together received 402 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes (3 papers), Psychosomatic Disorders and Their Treatments (2 papers), Pain Management and Placebo Effect (1 paper), Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies (1 paper), Smoking Behavior and Cessation (1 paper), Mental Health Research Topics (1 paper), Sexuality, Behavior, and Technology (1 paper) and Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (212 citations), Applied Psychology (60 citations), Human-Computer Interaction (45 citations), Clinical Psychology (167 citations) and Sensory Systems (32 citations). Jonathan D. Horowitz has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Michael J. Telch, Kate Wolitzky‐Taylor, Mark B. Powers, Jesse R. Cougle, Han‐Joo Lee, Diane McIntosh, Renée D. Goodwin, Yoko Nomura, Deborah S. Hasin and Sandro Galea. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Behavior Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry, Annals of Epidemiology, Clinical Psychology Review and Journal of Traumatic Stress.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact