Jonathan Creamer
Impact in
- Safety Research top 5%
- Forensic Fingerprint Detection Methods
- Health Informatics top 10%
Papers in
-
- Forensic Fingerprint Detection Methods 5
- Academic integrity and plagiarism 1
- Genetics 3
- Forensic and Genetic Research 2
- Co-authors
- T. I. Quickenden (6 shared papers)Patrick A. Robertson (2 shared papers)Rasha A. Ruhayel (1 shared paper)Courtney Ennis (1 shared paper)Hong Xu (1 shared paper)Mary E. Loveless (1 shared paper)John Awad (1 shared paper)Paul Bock (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- CBE—Life Sciences Education (1 paper)Journal of Water Process Engineering (1 paper)Publications (1 paper)Journal of Biological Chemistry (1 paper)Luminescence (6 papers)
- Partner nations
- AustraliaUnited StatesNetherlands
In The Last Decade
Jonathan Creamer
11 papers receiving 335 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 82
- Safety Research 131
- Health Informatics 15
- Archeology 64
- General Dentistry 8
- Insect Science 58
Countries citing papers authored by Jonathan Creamer
This map shows the geographic impact of Jonathan Creamer's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jonathan Creamer with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jonathan Creamer more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Jonathan Creamer
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jonathan Creamer. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jonathan Creamer. The network helps show where Jonathan Creamer may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 16 scholars most cited alongside Jonathan Creamer, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2006 | 85 | |
| 2 | 2001 | 66 | |
| 3 | 2003 | 43 | |
| 4 | 2005 | 40 | |
| 5 | 2009 | 34 | |
| 6 | 2014 | 28 | |
| 7 | 2004 | 24 | |
| 8 | 2014 | 13 | |
| 9 | 2011 | 9 | |
| 10 | 2023 | 4 | |
| 11 | 2002 | 1 |
About Jonathan Creamer
Jonathan Creamer is a scholar working on Safety Research, Genetics, Archeology, Insect Science and Molecular Biology, having authored 11 papers that have together received 347 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Forensic Fingerprint Detection Methods (5 papers), Forensic Entomology and Diptera Studies (3 papers), Forensic Anthropology and Bioarchaeology Studies (2 papers), Forensic and Genetic Research (2 papers), Academic integrity and plagiarism (1 paper), Conservation Techniques and Studies (1 paper), Heparin-Induced Thrombocytopenia and Thrombosis (1 paper) and Paleopathology and ancient diseases (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Safety Research (131 citations), Health Informatics (15 citations), Archeology (64 citations), General Dentistry (8 citations) and Insect Science (58 citations). Jonathan Creamer has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, United States and Netherlands. Frequent co-authors include T. I. Quickenden, Patrick A. Robertson, Rasha A. Ruhayel, Courtney Ennis, Hong Xu, Mary E. Loveless, John Awad, Paul Bock, Edoardo Bertone and Virginia L. Shepherd. Their work appears in journals such as CBE—Life Sciences Education, Journal of Water Process Engineering, Publications, Journal of Biological Chemistry and Luminescence.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.