Jonathan Ben-Naim

684 citations
20 papers · 247 · h-index 8

Impact in

Papers in

Jonathan Ben-Naim

20 papers receiving 243 citations

Peers

Jonathan Ben-Naim
Comparison fields: 5 of 34
  • Artificial Intelligence 220
  • Computational Theory and Mathematics 58
  • Management Information Systems 22
  • Geology 5
  • Signal Processing 9
Replace Nico Potyka with:
Nico Potyka Germany
Florence Dupin de Saint-Cyr France
Alexander Bochman Israel
Uta Schwertel Germany
Pavlos Peppas Australia
Dav M. Gabbay United Kingdom
Marie Duží Czechia
Amélie Cordier France
B. van Linder Netherlands
Piotr Kulicki Poland
Jonathan Ben-Naim relative to Nico Potyka Germany Nico Potyka's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.2×
Nico Potyka · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Jonathan Ben-Naim

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Jonathan Ben-Naim's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jonathan Ben-Naim with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jonathan Ben-Naim more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Jonathan Ben-Naim

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jonathan Ben-Naim. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jonathan Ben-Naim. The network helps show where Jonathan Ben-Naim may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 12 scholars most cited alongside Jonathan Ben-Naim, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Jonathan Ben-Naim Line = papers co-authored together Jonathan Ben-Naim links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#Work
1 201382
2 200642
3 200821
4
Ranking-based semantics for argumentation frameworks
201318
5 201718
6 202217
7 201011
8
Answer Set Programming encoding of Prioritized Removed Sets Revision: Application to GIS
20107
9 20087
10 20174
11 20084
12 20044
13 20122
14 20132
15 20052
16 20052
17 20141
18 20201
19 20171
20 20051

About Jonathan Ben-Naim

Jonathan Ben-Naim is a scholar working on Artificial Intelligence, Sociology and Political Science, Computational Theory and Mathematics, Philosophy and General Decision Sciences, having authored 20 papers that have together received 247 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Logic, Reasoning, and Knowledge (17 papers), Multi-Agent Systems and Negotiation (9 papers), Semantic Web and Ontologies (7 papers), Logic, programming, and type systems (4 papers), Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics (3 papers), Access Control and Trust (3 papers), Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics (3 papers) and Advanced Algebra and Logic (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Artificial Intelligence (220 citations), Computational Theory and Mathematics (58 citations), Management Information Systems (22 citations), Geology (5 citations) and Signal Processing (9 citations). Jonathan Ben-Naim has collaborated with scholars based in France, Israel and Poland. Frequent co-authors include Leïla Amgoud, Beata Konikowska, Arnon Avron, Salem Benferhat, Odile Papini, Jean‐François Bonnefon, Andreas Herzig, Emiliano Lorini, Henri Prade and Nic Wilson. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Logic and Computation, AI & Society, Applied Intelligence, Logica Universalis and Lecture notes in computer science.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact