B. van Linder

783 citations
13 papers · 146 · h-index 6

Impact in

Papers in

B. van Linder

12 papers receiving 124 citations

Peers

B. van Linder
Comparison fields: 5 of 13
  • Artificial Intelligence 142
  • Computational Theory and Mathematics 23
  • Philosophy 10
  • Management Science and Operations Research 9
  • Social Psychology 13
Replace Joseph Rosenzweig with:
Joseph Rosenzweig United States
Włodzimierz Rabinowicz Sweden
Tomohiro Hoshi United States
Bryan Renne Netherlands
Michał Marcińczuk Poland
Isabelle Tellier France
David Farwell United States
Jan Tore Lønning Norway
Michael Dorna Germany
Andr� Fuhrmann Germany
B. van Linder relative to Joseph Rosenzweig United States Joseph Rosenzweig's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×6.5×
Joseph Rosenzweig · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by B. van Linder

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of B. van Linder's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by B. van Linder with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites B. van Linder more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by B. van Linder

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by B. van Linder. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by B. van Linder. The network helps show where B. van Linder may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 5 scholars most cited alongside B. van Linder, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with B. van Linder Line = papers co-authored together B. van Linder links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

13 of 13 papers shown
#Work
1 199969
2 199827
3 199917
4
Tests as epistemic updates
199410
5
Unravelling nondeterminism: on having the ability to choose (extended abstract)
19955
6 19975
7
Modelling rational agents in a dynamic environment: Putting humpty dumpty together again
19963
8
Tests as epistemic updates - pursuit of knowledge
19942
9
Formalizing motivational attitudes of agents using the KARO framework
19972
10
Unravelling nondeterminism: On having the ability to choose
19932
11 19972
12
A dynamic logic of iterated belief change
19951
13
Actions that Make you Change your Mind --- Belief Revision in an Agent-Oriented Setting
19941

About B. van Linder

B. van Linder is a scholar working on Artificial Intelligence, Computational Theory and Mathematics, Philosophy, Infectious Diseases and Organic Chemistry, having authored 13 papers that have together received 146 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Logic, Reasoning, and Knowledge (8 papers), Multi-Agent Systems and Negotiation (7 papers), Semantic Web and Ontologies (4 papers), Advanced Algebra and Logic (2 papers), Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics (1 paper) and AI-based Problem Solving and Planning (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Artificial Intelligence (142 citations), Computational Theory and Mathematics (23 citations), Philosophy (10 citations), Management Science and Operations Research (9 citations) and Social Psychology (13 citations). B. van Linder has collaborated with scholars based in Netherlands. Frequent co-authors include Wiebe van der Hoek, John-Jules Meyer, John‐Jules Ch. Meyer, Frank Dignum and J-J.Ch. Meyer. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Logic Language and Information, Artificial Intelligence, Data & Knowledge Engineering, Mathematical Social Sciences and Fundamenta Informaticae.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact