Doreen Fraser

586 citations
13 papers · 268 · h-index 8

Impact in

Papers in

Doreen Fraser

12 papers receiving 240 citations

Peers

Doreen Fraser
Comparison fields: 5 of 36
  • History and Philosophy of Science 116
  • Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics 210
  • Statistical and Nonlinear Physics 75
  • Astronomy and Astrophysics 78
  • Nuclear and High Energy Physics 36
Replace Dirk-André Deckert with:
Dirk-André Deckert Germany
Laura Ruetsche United States
Valia Allori United States
Karim P. Y. Thébault United Kingdom
Travis Norsen United States
Elena Castellani Italy
David J. Baker United States
Richard Dawid Sweden
Graciela Domenech Argentina
Eleanor Knox United Kingdom
Doreen Fraser relative to Dirk-André Deckert Germany Dirk-André Deckert's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.1×
Dirk-André Deckert · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Doreen Fraser

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Doreen Fraser's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Doreen Fraser with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Doreen Fraser more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Doreen Fraser

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Doreen Fraser. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Doreen Fraser. The network helps show where Doreen Fraser may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 1 scholars most cited alongside Doreen Fraser, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Doreen Fraser Line = papers co-authored together Doreen Fraser links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

13 of 13 papers shown
#Work
1 200872
2 200645
3 201145
4 200944
5 201816
6 201614
7
Haag's Theorem and the Interpretation of Quantum Field Theories with Interactions
20068
8 20247
9 20236
10 20155
11 20233
12 20052
13 20121

About Doreen Fraser

Doreen Fraser is a scholar working on Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, History and Philosophy of Science, Statistical and Nonlinear Physics, Nuclear and High Energy Physics and Astronomy and Astrophysics, having authored 13 papers that have together received 268 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Quantum Mechanics and Applications (11 papers), Philosophy and History of Science (5 papers), Particle physics theoretical and experimental studies (3 papers), Noncommutative and Quantum Gravity Theories (3 papers), Relativity and Gravitational Theory (2 papers), Biofield Effects and Biophysics (2 papers), Quantum Electrodynamics and Casimir Effect (2 papers) and Advanced Operator Algebra Research (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in History and Philosophy of Science (116 citations), Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics (210 citations), Statistical and Nonlinear Physics (75 citations), Astronomy and Astrophysics (78 citations) and Nuclear and High Energy Physics (36 citations). Doreen Fraser has collaborated with scholars based in Canada, United States and Greece. Frequent co-authors include John Earman. Their work appears in journals such as Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics, Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A, Philosophy of Science, Erkenntnis and The European Physical Journal H.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact