Jonathan Ashley Smith
Impact in
- Clinical Psychology top 0.2%
- Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications
- Family and Disability Support Research
- Counseling, Therapy, and Family Dynamics
- Grief, Bereavement, and Mental Health
- Migration, Health and Trauma
- Social Psychology top 0.2%
Papers in
-
- Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications 11
- Counseling, Therapy, and Family Dynamics 8
- Grief, Bereavement, and Mental Health 7
- Co-authors
- Mike Osborn (9 shared papers)Virginia Eatough (12 shared papers)Pnina Shinebourne (5 shared papers)Maria Jarman (3 shared papers)Richard Oliver de Visser (5 shared papers)Rachel Louise Shaw (4 shared papers)David R.H. Jones (3 shared papers)Bridget Young (3 shared papers)
- Journals
- Journal of Health Psychology (8 papers)Qualitative Research in Psychology (7 papers)Psychology and Health (7 papers)Psychology and Psychotherapy Theory Research and Practice (4 papers)British Journal of Health Psychology (4 papers)
- Partner nations
- United KingdomUnited StatesAustralia
In The Last Decade
Jonathan Ashley Smith
201 papers receiving 16.5k citations
Jonathan Ashley Smith's Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 198
- Clinical Psychology 4.8k
- Social Psychology 2.9k
- Applied Psychology 502
- General Health Professions 2.5k
- Safety Research 850
Countries citing papers authored by Jonathan Ashley Smith
This map shows the geographic impact of Jonathan Ashley Smith's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jonathan Ashley Smith with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jonathan Ashley Smith more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Jonathan Ashley Smith
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jonathan Ashley Smith. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jonathan Ashley Smith. The network helps show where Jonathan Ashley Smith may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Jonathan Ashley Smith, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 216 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Beyond the divide between cognition and discourse: Using interpretative phenomenological analysis in health psychology Hit paper breakdown → | 1996 | 1552 |
| 2 | Reflecting on the development of interpretative phenomenological analysis and its contribution to qualitative research in psychology Hit paper breakdown → | 2008 | 1303 |
| 3 | Interpretative phenomenological analysis. Hit paper breakdown → | 2012 | 1264 |
| 4 | Doing Interpretative Phenomenological Analysis Hit paper breakdown → | 1999 | 1237 |
| 5 | Evaluating the contribution of interpretative phenomenological analysis Hit paper breakdown → | 2010 | 988 |
| 6 | Semi-Structured Interviewing and Qualitative Analysis Hit paper breakdown → | 1995 | 957 |
| 7 | Interpretative phenomenological analysis as a useful methodology for research on the lived experience of pain Hit paper breakdown → | 2014 | 677 |
| 8 | How can systematic reviews incorporate qualitative research? A critical perspective Hit paper breakdown → | 2006 | 670 |
| 9 | Interpretative Phenomenological Analysis Hit paper breakdown → | 2007 | 526 |
| 10 | Appraising qualitative research for inclusion in systematic reviews: a quantitative and qualitative comparison of three methods Hit paper breakdown → | 2007 | 465 |
| 11 | Interpretative Phenomenological Analysis Hit paper breakdown → | 2008 | 436 |
| 12 | 2006 | 404 | |
| 13 | Interpretative Phenomenological Analysis Hit paper breakdown → | 2017 | 342 |
| 14 | 1998 | 297 | |
| 15 | 2004 | 243 | |
| 16 | Interpretative phenomenological analysis. Hit paper breakdown → | 2021 | 223 |
| 17 | 2006 | 214 | |
| 18 | Achieving excellence in interpretative phenomenological analysis (IPA): Four markers of high quality Hit paper breakdown → | 2021 | 210 |
| 19 | 2007 | 204 | |
| 20 | 2002 | 203 |
About Jonathan Ashley Smith
Jonathan Ashley Smith is a scholar working on Clinical Psychology, Social Psychology, General Health Professions, Psychiatry and Mental health and Sociology and Political Science, having authored 216 papers that have together received 17.8k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications (11 papers), BRCA gene mutations in cancer (11 papers), Genetic Neurodegenerative Diseases (9 papers), Counseling, Therapy, and Family Dynamics (8 papers), Empathy and Medical Education (8 papers), Grief, Bereavement, and Mental Health (7 papers), Identity, Memory, and Therapy (7 papers) and HIV/AIDS Research and Interventions (7 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Clinical Psychology (4.8k citations), Social Psychology (2.9k citations), Applied Psychology (502 citations), General Health Professions (2.5k citations) and Safety Research (850 citations). Jonathan Ashley Smith has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Australia. Frequent co-authors include Mike Osborn, Virginia Eatough, Pnina Shinebourne, Maria Jarman, Richard Oliver de Visser, Rachel Louise Shaw, David R.H. Jones, Bridget Young, Alex J. Sutton and Andrew Booth. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Health Psychology, Qualitative Research in Psychology, Psychology and Health, Psychology and Psychotherapy Theory Research and Practice and British Journal of Health Psychology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.