Jonathan Almer

307 papers receiving 8.9k citations

Peers

Jonathan Almer
Comparison fields: 5 of 141
  • Metals and Alloys 536
  • Ceramics and Composites 989
  • Materials Chemistry 5.4k
  • Mechanical Engineering 4.0k
  • Mechanics of Materials 1.8k
Replace Johann Michler with:
Johann Michler Switzerland
Joachim Mayer Germany
T.J. Marrow United Kingdom
David C. Dunand United States
Mark R. Daymond Canada
Kenneth S. Vecchio United States
Mathias Göken Germany
Yukichi Umakoshi Japan
G. C. Weatherly Canada
Takayoshi Nakano Japan
Jonathan Almer relative to Johann Michler Switzerland Johann Michler's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.4×
Johann Michler · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Jonathan Almer

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Jonathan Almer's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jonathan Almer with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jonathan Almer more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Jonathan Almer

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jonathan Almer. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jonathan Almer. The network helps show where Jonathan Almer may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Jonathan Almer, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Jonathan Almer Line = papers co-authored together Jonathan Almer links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 313 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2010269
2 2013233
3 2006223
4 2011202
5 2019171
6 2006132
7 2005131
8 2007126
9 2017119
10 2010116
11 2010112
12 2012107
13 2001107
14 2009105
15 2014102
16 2018102
17 2015100
18 200698
19 202097
20 200396

About Jonathan Almer

Jonathan Almer is a scholar working on Materials Chemistry, Mechanical Engineering, Mechanics of Materials, Aerospace Engineering and Biomedical Engineering, having authored 313 papers that have together received 9.0k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Nuclear Materials and Properties (69 papers), Fusion materials and technologies (54 papers), Microstructure and mechanical properties (49 papers), Microstructure and Mechanical Properties of Steels (39 papers), Metal and Thin Film Mechanics (38 papers), High-Temperature Coating Behaviors (36 papers), Advanced ceramic materials synthesis (29 papers) and Hydrogen embrittlement and corrosion behaviors in metals (27 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Metals and Alloys (536 citations), Ceramics and Composites (989 citations), Materials Chemistry (5.4k citations), Mechanical Engineering (4.0k citations) and Mechanics of Materials (1.8k citations). Jonathan Almer has collaborated with scholars based in United States, China and Germany. Frequent co-authors include Stuart R. Stock, Magnus Odén, Ulrich Lienert, Péter Kenesei, Mark R. Daymond, David C. Dunand, Jun‐Sang Park, D. R. Haeffner, John Okasinski and Meimei Li. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Nuclear Materials, Acta Materialia, Materials Science and Engineering A, Scripta Materialia and Journal of materials research/Pratt's guide to venture capital sources.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact