Jonas Neubert

15 papers receiving 396 citations

Peers

Jonas Neubert
Comparison fields: 5 of 61
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 115
  • Condensed Matter Physics 79
  • Developmental and Educational Psychology 74
  • Human Factors and Ergonomics 14
  • Computer Science Applications 26
Replace Timothy Neate with:
Timothy Neate United Kingdom
Ernest Edmonds Australia
Kenneth Y. T. Lim Singapore
Nathan Mentzer United States
Jung Lim United States
Brad Hokanson United States
Jason Tham United States
Alma Leora Culén Norway
Suguru Ishizaki United States
Catherine Berdanier United States
Jonas Neubert relative to Timothy Neate United Kingdom Timothy Neate's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×4×6×8.8×
Timothy Neate · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Jonas Neubert

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Jonas Neubert's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jonas Neubert with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jonas Neubert more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Jonas Neubert

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jonas Neubert. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jonas Neubert. The network helps show where Jonas Neubert may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 14 scholars most cited alongside Jonas Neubert, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Jonas Neubert Line = papers co-authored together Jonas Neubert links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

15 of 15 papers shown
#Work
1 201597
2 201555
3 201442
4 201540
5 201437
6 201035
7 201427
8 201024
9 201622
10 201415
11 201515
12 20164
13 20152
14
Complex problem solving. Facilitating the utilization of a concept towards lifelong education. Special Issue
20151
15 20151

About Jonas Neubert

Jonas Neubert is a scholar working on Developmental and Educational Psychology, Mechanical Engineering, Condensed Matter Physics, Artificial Intelligence and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, having authored 15 papers that have together received 417 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Educational and Psychological Assessments (5 papers), Modular Robots and Swarm Intelligence (4 papers), Cognitive Abilities and Testing (3 papers), Micro and Nano Robotics (3 papers), Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods (3 papers), Cognitive Science and Mapping (3 papers), Innovative Education and Learning Practices (2 papers) and Optimization and Search Problems (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (115 citations), Condensed Matter Physics (79 citations), Developmental and Educational Psychology (74 citations), Human Factors and Ergonomics (14 citations) and Computer Science Applications (26 citations). Jonas Neubert has collaborated with scholars based in Luxembourg, Germany and United States. Frequent co-authors include Samuel Greiff, André Kretzschmar, Hod Lipson, Sascha Wüstenberg, Andreas Fischer, David Erickson, Michael T. Tolley, David Erickson, Thomas Lans and Christoph Niepel. Their work appears in journals such as International Journal of Lifelong Education, IEEE Transactions on Robotics, Industrial and Organizational Psychology, Zeitschrift für Pädagogische Psychologie and Learning and Individual Differences.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact