Jonas Nahm

28 papers receiving 885 citations

Peers

Jonas Nahm
Comparison fields: 5 of 82
  • General Energy 35
  • Business and International Management 34
  • Economics and Econometrics 410
  • Development 52
  • Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment 212
Replace Anna Pegels with:
Anna Pegels Germany
Mindaugas Butkus Lithuania
D. Rodrik United States
Rainer Quitzow Germany
Caetano Penna United Kingdom
Emma Aisbett Australia
Muhammad Abdul Kamal Pakistan
T.W. Berrie United Kingdom
Isaac Appiah‐Otoo China
James Haselip Denmark
Jonas Nahm relative to Anna Pegels Germany Anna Pegels's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×5.3×
Anna Pegels · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Jonas Nahm

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Jonas Nahm's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jonas Nahm with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jonas Nahm more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Jonas Nahm

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jonas Nahm. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jonas Nahm. The network helps show where Jonas Nahm may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 20 scholars most cited alongside Jonas Nahm, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Jonas Nahm Line = papers co-authored together Jonas Nahm links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 30 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2018188
2 2013138
3 2018100
4 202171
5 201865
6 201956
7 202149
8 201748
9 201743
10 202238
11 202430
12 202226
13 202421
14 202219
15 202118
16 201713
17 202111
18 20127
19 20225
20 20145

About Jonas Nahm

Jonas Nahm is a scholar working on Economics and Econometrics, Political Science and International Relations, Strategy and Management, Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment and General Economics, Econometrics and Finance, having authored 30 papers that have together received 971 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Climate Change Policy and Economics (10 papers), Energy, Environment, Economic Growth (7 papers), Asian Industrial and Economic Development (6 papers), Energy, Environment, and Transportation Policies (5 papers), China's Socioeconomic Reforms and Governance (4 papers), Innovation and Knowledge Management (4 papers), Global trade, sustainability, and social impact (4 papers) and Social Policy and Reform Studies (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in General Energy (35 citations), Business and International Management (34 citations), Economics and Econometrics (410 citations), Development (52 citations) and Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment (212 citations). Jonas Nahm has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Norway and Germany. Frequent co-authors include Jonas Meckling, Edward S. Steinfeld, John Paul Helveston, Johannes Urpelainen, Bentley B. Allan, Scot M. Miller, Genia Kostka, Valerie J. Karplus, Alex Wang and Michael R. Davidson. Their work appears in journals such as Review of International Political Economy, The China Quarterly, Perspectives on Politics, Science and American Political Science Review.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact