Jonas Eberhard

1.1k citations
45 papers · 749 · h-index 17

Impact in

Papers in

Jonas Eberhard

43 papers receiving 719 citations

Peers

Jonas Eberhard
Comparison fields: 5 of 67
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 422
  • Biological Psychiatry 29
  • Family Practice 13
  • Clinical Psychology 108
  • Applied Psychology 19
Replace Clélia Quilès with:
Clélia Quilès France
Ján Pečeňák Slovakia
Constantin Tranulis Canada
Colin P. O’Donnell Australia
Michael D. Teehan Canada
Núria Cruz Spain
Jae-Won Yang South Korea
Martha X Sajatovic United States
Outi Poutanen Finland
Anne Emilie Stürup Denmark
Jonas Eberhard relative to Clélia Quilès France Clélia Quilès's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×5×10×16×
Clélia Quilès · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Jonas Eberhard

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Jonas Eberhard's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jonas Eberhard with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jonas Eberhard more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Jonas Eberhard

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jonas Eberhard. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jonas Eberhard. The network helps show where Jonas Eberhard may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Jonas Eberhard, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Jonas Eberhard Line = papers co-authored together Jonas Eberhard links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 45 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 200571
2 201352
3 200749
4 200544
5 201738
6 200837
7 202232
8 200732
9 200530
10 200330
11 202228
12 201725
13 201323
14 201522
15 200719
16 201918
17 201117
18 201916
19 201616
20 201514

About Jonas Eberhard

Jonas Eberhard is a scholar working on Psychiatry and Mental health, Cognitive Neuroscience, Philosophy, Clinical Psychology and Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, having authored 45 papers that have together received 749 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Schizophrenia research and treatment (15 papers), Bipolar Disorder and Treatment (9 papers), Down syndrome and intellectual disability research (4 papers), Autism Spectrum Disorder Research (3 papers), Mental Health and Psychiatry (3 papers), Mental Health Treatment and Access (2 papers), Suicide and Self-Harm Studies (2 papers) and Electroconvulsive Therapy Studies (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Psychiatry and Mental health (422 citations), Biological Psychiatry (29 citations), Family Practice (13 citations), Clinical Psychology (108 citations) and Applied Psychology (19 citations). Jonas Eberhard has collaborated with scholars based in Sweden, United Kingdom and Denmark. Frequent co-authors include Sten E. Levander, Eva Lindström, Henrik Lublin, Allan Hunter Young, Gerd Ahlström, Lars Farde, Wilhelm Haverkamp, Margda Wærn, Mohammad Ghaziuddin and Christopher Gillberg. Their work appears in journals such as Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica, BMC Psychiatry, European Psychiatry, European Neuropsychopharmacology and International Clinical Psychopharmacology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact