Jonas Busk

28 papers receiving 625 citations

Peers

Jonas Busk
Comparison fields: 5 of 89
  • Applied Psychology 246
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 286
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 223
  • Biological Psychiatry 30
  • Clinical Psychology 90
Replace Brian Chin with:
Brian Chin United States
Michael Ball United Kingdom
Luis Sandoval United States
Julia Bondar United States
Łukasz Okruszek Poland
Niclas Palmius United Kingdom
Mieke H. J. Schulte Netherlands
James Welch United Kingdom
Ando C. Emerencia Netherlands
Agnes Grünerbl Germany
Jonas Busk relative to Brian Chin United States Brian Chin's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×4.7×
Brian Chin · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Jonas Busk

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Jonas Busk's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jonas Busk with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jonas Busk more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Jonas Busk

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jonas Busk. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jonas Busk. The network helps show where Jonas Busk may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Jonas Busk, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Jonas Busk Line = papers co-authored together Jonas Busk links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 28 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2016156
2 202268
3 201853
4 201935
5 201931
6 202030
7 201928
8 202024
9 201723
10 202322
11 202019
12 202017
13 202217
14 202116
15 201816
16 202015
17 202215
18 202010
19 20239
20 20218

About Jonas Busk

Jonas Busk is a scholar working on Psychiatry and Mental health, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Applied Psychology, Clinical Psychology and Materials Chemistry, having authored 28 papers that have together received 645 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Bipolar Disorder and Treatment (19 papers), Mental Health Research Topics (16 papers), Digital Mental Health Interventions (11 papers), Machine Learning in Materials Science (5 papers), Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development (3 papers), Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes (3 papers), Computational Drug Discovery Methods (2 papers) and Eating Disorders and Behaviors (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Applied Psychology (246 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (286 citations), Psychiatry and Mental health (223 citations), Biological Psychiatry (30 citations) and Clinical Psychology (90 citations). Jonas Busk has collaborated with scholars based in Denmark, Norway and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Lars Vedel Kessing, Maria Faurholt‐Jepsen, Jakob E. Bardram, Mads Frost, Ole Winther, Maj Vinberg, Ellen Margrethe Christensen, Arghya Bhowmik, Tejs Vegge and Darius A. Rohani. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Affective Disorders, Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica, International Journal of Bipolar Disorders, Translational Psychiatry and JMIR mhealth and uhealth.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact