Jon Freeman

27 papers receiving 637 citations

Peers

Jon Freeman
Comparison fields: 5 of 126
  • Software 47
  • Computational Theory and Mathematics 140
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 75
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 67
  • Computer Networks and Communications 119
Replace Brian Chin with:
Brian Chin United States
Judith A. Spray United States
Eric Mendelsohn Canada
Harriet Fell United States
Federico Mancini Norway
Mary Shepherd United States
Chris Exton Ireland
Mitsuhiro Okada Japan
Richard Booth United Kingdom
Deborah L. Schnipke United States
Jon Freeman relative to Brian Chin United States Brian Chin's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.0×
Brian Chin · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Jon Freeman

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Jon Freeman's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jon Freeman with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jon Freeman more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Jon Freeman

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jon Freeman. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jon Freeman. The network helps show where Jon Freeman may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Jon Freeman, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Jon Freeman Line = papers co-authored together Jon Freeman links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 29 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1
Improvements to propositional satisfiability search algorithms
1995204
2 199274
3 200365
4 201861
5 200644
6 201238
7 199634
8 201026
9 200923
10 201022
11 200421
12 201719
13
Parallel Algorithms for Depth-First Search
199112
14 201511
15 20218
16 20206
17 20116
18 20205
19 20144
20 20152

About Jon Freeman

Jon Freeman is a scholar working on Cognitive Neuroscience, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Computer Networks and Communications, Economics and Econometrics and Physiology, having authored 29 papers that have together received 696 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Sleep and Wakefulness Research (6 papers), Sleep and related disorders (4 papers), Defense, Military, and Policy Studies (3 papers), Obstructive Sleep Apnea Research (2 papers), Nonlinear Photonic Systems (1 paper), Attachment and Relationship Dynamics (1 paper), Primary Care and Health Outcomes (1 paper) and Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Software (47 citations), Computational Theory and Mathematics (140 citations), Psychiatry and Mental health (75 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (67 citations) and Computer Networks and Communications (119 citations). Jon Freeman has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Germany. Frequent co-authors include Gary Zammit, Michelle Scollo, Melanie Wakefield, Eliza Coleman, Harold A. Sackeïm, Martin McElhiney, Joan Prudic, D. P. Devanand, Timothy D. Wilkinson and Arthur Rifkin. Their work appears in journals such as Sleep Medicine, CHEST Journal, Applied Physics Letters, Optics Express and Journal of Clinical Psychopharmacology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact