Jon C. Laberg

1.9k citations
36 papers · 1.4k · h-index 20

Impact in

Papers in

Jon C. Laberg

35 papers receiving 1.3k citations

Peers

Jon C. Laberg
Comparison fields: 5 of 105
  • Applied Psychology 160
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 343
  • Clinical Psychology 469
  • Behavioral Neuroscience 61
  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine 271
Replace Isa Dolski with:
Isa Dolski United States
Sang Hee Kim South Korea
Mirtes Garcia Pereira Brazil
Olav Vassend Norway
Michael Myrtek Germany
Neville M. Blampied New Zealand
Jan Mohlman United States
Yuji Sakano Japan
Bethany E. Kok Germany
Julia Anna Glombiewski Germany
Jon C. Laberg relative to Isa Dolski United States Isa Dolski's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.4×
Isa Dolski · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Jon C. Laberg

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Jon C. Laberg's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jon C. Laberg with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jon C. Laberg more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Jon C. Laberg

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jon C. Laberg. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jon C. Laberg. The network helps show where Jon C. Laberg may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Jon C. Laberg, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Jon C. Laberg Line = papers co-authored together Jon C. Laberg links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 36 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2003226
2 2002165
3 2000108
4 2002101
5 200993
6 199575
7 199569
8 199758
9 198755
10 200351
11 199544
12 201640
13 199137
14 201136
15 200133
16 198130
17 198929
18 201527
19 201026
20 200319

About Jon C. Laberg

Jon C. Laberg is a scholar working on Clinical Psychology, Cognitive Neuroscience, Applied Psychology, Sociology and Political Science and Epidemiology, having authored 36 papers that have together received 1.4k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Resilience and Mental Health (6 papers), Behavioral Health and Interventions (5 papers), Eating Disorders and Behaviors (5 papers), Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes (4 papers), Olfactory and Sensory Function Studies (4 papers), Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Research (4 papers), Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies (3 papers) and Impact of Technology on Adolescents (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Applied Psychology (160 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (343 citations), Clinical Psychology (469 citations), Behavioral Neuroscience (61 citations) and Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine (271 citations). Jon C. Laberg has collaborated with scholars based in Norway, United States and Sweden. Frequent co-authors include Julian F. Thayer, Bjørn Helge Johnsen, Jarle Eid, Paul T. Bartone, Sigurd W. Hystad, Helge Nordby, Kjell Morten Stormark, Kenneth Hugdahl, Bjørn Ellertsen and L. E. Aaro. Their work appears in journals such as Military Psychology, Addictive Behaviors, Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica, Psychology of Addictive Behaviors and International Journal of Psychophysiology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact