Jolene Lin

26 papers receiving 241 citations

Peers

Jolene Lin
Comparison fields: 5 of 66
  • Law 108
  • Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law 59
  • Global and Planetary Change 65
  • Pollution 32
  • Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering 23
Replace Ludwig Krämer with:
Ludwig Krämer Belgium
Francesco Sindico United Kingdom
Stephen Stec Austria
Alexandre Charles Kiss Belgium
Ling Zhu Hong Kong
Christina Voigt Norway
Veerle Heyvaert United Kingdom
Daniel Bodansky United States
Sander Happaerts Belgium
Don Anton Latvia
Jolene Lin relative to Ludwig Krämer Belgium Ludwig Krämer's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.3×
Ludwig Krämer · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Jolene Lin

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Jolene Lin's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jolene Lin with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jolene Lin more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Jolene Lin

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jolene Lin. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jolene Lin. The network helps show where Jolene Lin may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 22 scholars most cited alongside Jolene Lin, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Jolene Lin Line = papers co-authored together Jolene Lin links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 29 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201979
2 201934
3 202028
4 201127
5 201718
6 201511
7 202011
8 20178
9 20097
10 20196
11 20186
12
Mobilising Finance for Climate Change Mitigation: Private Sector Involvement in International Carbon Finance Mechanisms
20094
13 20244
14 20094
15 20134
16
The First Successful Climate Negligence Case: A Comment on Urgenda Foundation v. The State of the Netherlands
20153
17 20153
18 20133
19 20123
20 20103

About Jolene Lin

Jolene Lin is a scholar working on Law, Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law, Sociology and Political Science, Economics and Econometrics and Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management, having authored 29 papers that have together received 273 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Environmental law and policy (19 papers), International Environmental Law and Policies (12 papers), Corporate Law and Human Rights (6 papers), Climate Change Policy and Economics (5 papers), Climate Change, Adaptation, Migration (3 papers), Regulation and Compliance Studies (3 papers), Arctic and Russian Policy Studies (2 papers) and Maritime Transport Emissions and Efficiency (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Law (108 citations), Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law (59 citations), Global and Planetary Change (65 citations), Pollution (32 citations) and Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering (23 citations). Jolene Lin has collaborated with scholars based in Singapore, Hong Kong and Australia. Frequent co-authors include Jacqueline Peel, Charlotte Streck, Veerle Heyvaert, Daniel A. Farber, Joanne Scott, Cinnamon Piñon Carlarne, Takanobu Kosugi, Arunabha Ghosh, Atsushi Kurosawa and Wil Burns. Their work appears in journals such as Transnational Environmental Law, Climate Law, Journal of Environmental Law, American Journal of International Law and Climatic Change.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact