Johnnie Gratton

690 citations
22 papers · 285 · h-index 5

Impact in

Papers in

Johnnie Gratton

14 papers receiving 144 citations

Peers

Johnnie Gratton
Comparison fields: 5 of 64
  • Literature and Literary Theory 55
  • Philosophy 54
  • Visual Arts and Performing Arts 21
  • General Psychology 5
  • Anthropology 30
Replace Verena Andermatt Conley with:
Verena Andermatt Conley United States
Hartmut Böhme Germany
Isabelle de Courtivron
Samuel Lipman
Ellen Rooney United States
John G. Rodden United States
Hassan Melehy United States
Simon Jarvis United Kingdom
Alice Goldfarb Marquis United States
Charlotte Hogsett
Johnnie Gratton relative to Verena Andermatt Conley United States Verena Andermatt Conley's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×2.6×
Verena Andermatt Conley · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Johnnie Gratton

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Johnnie Gratton's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Johnnie Gratton with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Johnnie Gratton more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Johnnie Gratton

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Johnnie Gratton. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Johnnie Gratton. The network helps show where Johnnie Gratton may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 3 scholars most cited alongside Johnnie Gratton, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Johnnie Gratton Line = papers co-authored together Johnnie Gratton links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 22 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1988227
2
The art of the project : projects and experiments in modern French culture
200513
3 198611
4 20059
5 19965
6
Subject Matters. Subject and Self in French Literature from Descartes to the present.
20004
7 20032
8 19952
9 20172
10 19971
11 20181
12 19971
13 20031
14 19941
15
Expressivism: The Vicissitudes of a Theory in the Writing of Proust and Barthes
20001
16 19961
17 20051
18 19861
19 20051
20 19820

About Johnnie Gratton

Johnnie Gratton is a scholar working on Literature and Literary Theory, Classics, Visual Arts and Performing Arts, Computer Networks and Communications and Cultural Studies, having authored 22 papers that have together received 285 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include French Literature and Critical Theory (9 papers), French Literature and Criticism (6 papers), Cultural Insights and Digital Impacts (4 papers), Visual Culture and Art Theory (2 papers), Diverse Cultural and Historical Studies (2 papers), Renaissance Literature and Culture (2 papers), Irish and British Studies (2 papers) and Historical Studies and Socio-cultural Analysis (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Literature and Literary Theory (55 citations), Philosophy (54 citations), Visual Arts and Performing Arts (21 citations), General Psychology (5 citations) and Anthropology (30 citations). Johnnie Gratton has collaborated with scholars based in Ireland. Frequent co-authors include Michael Sheringham, Paul John Eakin and Paul Gifford. Their work appears in journals such as Forum for Modern Language Studies, French Studies, Nottingham French Studies, The Modern Language Review and Poetics Today.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact