French Studies Bulletin

199 papers and 156 indexed citations i.

About

The 199 papers published in French Studies Bulletin in the last decades have received a total of 156 indexed citations. Papers published in French Studies Bulletin usually cover Literature and Literary Theory (43 papers), Anthropology (31 papers) and History and Philosophy of Science (24 papers) specifically the topics of Historical and Literary Studies (28 papers), Historical Studies and Socio-cultural Analysis (23 papers) and French Literature and Criticism (20 papers). The most active scholars publishing in French Studies Bulletin are Peter Robinson, James A. Coleman, Glyn S. Burgess, Mary Orr, David Trotter, J. Campbell, Elizabeth Wilson, Raymond A. Mentzer, Claudio Giachetti and R. K. Shah.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in French Studies Bulletin

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in French Studies Bulletin. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in French Studies Bulletin.

Countries where authors publish in French Studies Bulletin

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in French Studies Bulletin. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in French Studies Bulletin with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites French Studies Bulletin more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025