John Zerilli
Impact in
- Health Informatics top 1%
- Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
- Safety Research top 2%
- Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
Papers in
-
- Action Observation and Synchronization 3
- Human-Automation Interaction and Safety 2
-
- Ethics and Social Impacts of AI 5
- Co-authors
- James Maclaurin (4 shared papers)Alistair Knott (3 shared papers)Colin Gavaghan (3 shared papers)Umang Bhatt (1 shared paper)Adrian Weller (1 shared paper)John Danaher (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- Philosophy of Science (2 papers)Biological Theory (1 paper)Synthese (1 paper)Philosophical Psychology (1 paper)Minds and Machines (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United KingdomNew ZealandAustralia
In The Last Decade
John Zerilli
13 papers receiving 461 citations
John Zerilli's Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 79
- Health Informatics 96
- Safety Research 245
- Artificial Intelligence 202
- General Decision Sciences 9
- Cognitive Neuroscience 86
Countries citing papers authored by John Zerilli
This map shows the geographic impact of John Zerilli's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by John Zerilli with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites John Zerilli more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by John Zerilli
This network shows the impact of papers produced by John Zerilli. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by John Zerilli. The network helps show where John Zerilli may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 6 scholars most cited alongside John Zerilli, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2018 | 252 | |
| 2 | How transparency modulates trust in artificial intelligence Hit paper breakdown → | 2022 | 116 |
| 3 | 2019 | 84 | |
| 4 | 2021 | 14 | |
| 5 | Government Use of Artificial Intelligence in New Zealand | 2019 | 13 |
| 6 | 2017 | 11 | |
| 7 | 2018 | 7 | |
| 8 | 2022 | 5 | |
| 9 | 2017 | 5 | |
| 10 | 2021 | 3 | |
| 11 | 2019 | 3 | |
| 12 | 2014 | 2 | |
| 13 | 2007 | 1 | |
| 14 | 2021 | 1 | |
| 15 | 2006 | 1 | |
| 16 | 2021 | 0 | |
| 17 | 2022 | 0 | |
| 18 | 2022 | 0 | |
| 19 | 2020 | 0 |
About John Zerilli
John Zerilli is a scholar working on Social Psychology, Safety Research, Cognitive Neuroscience, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology and Political Science and International Relations, having authored 19 papers that have together received 518 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Ethics and Social Impacts of AI (5 papers), Artificial Intelligence in Law (3 papers), Embodied and Extended Cognition (3 papers), Action Observation and Synchronization (3 papers), Language and cultural evolution (2 papers), Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems (2 papers), Human-Automation Interaction and Safety (2 papers) and Philosophy and Theoretical Science (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Health Informatics (96 citations), Safety Research (245 citations), Artificial Intelligence (202 citations), General Decision Sciences (9 citations) and Cognitive Neuroscience (86 citations). John Zerilli has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, New Zealand and Australia. Frequent co-authors include James Maclaurin, Alistair Knott, Colin Gavaghan, Umang Bhatt, Adrian Weller and John Danaher. Their work appears in journals such as Philosophy of Science, Biological Theory, Synthese, Philosophical Psychology and Minds and Machines.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.