John Zerilli
Impact in
- Health Informatics top 1%
- Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
- Safety Research top 2%
- Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
Papers in
-
- Action Observation and Synchronization 3
- Human-Automation Interaction and Safety 2
-
- Embodied and Extended Cognition 3
- Co-authors
- James Maclaurin (4 shared papers)Alistair Knott (3 shared papers)Colin Gavaghan (3 shared papers)Adrian Weller (1 shared paper)Umang Bhatt (1 shared paper)John Danaher (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- Philosophy of Science (2 papers)Synthese (1 paper)Biology & Philosophy (1 paper)Science (1 paper)Philosophical Psychology (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United KingdomAustraliaNew Zealand
In The Last Decade
John Zerilli
13 papers receiving 376 citations
John Zerilli's Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 69
- Health Informatics 92
- Safety Research 198
- Artificial Intelligence 164
- General Decision Sciences 9
- Cognitive Neuroscience 72
Countries citing papers authored by John Zerilli
This map shows the geographic impact of John Zerilli's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by John Zerilli with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites John Zerilli more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by John Zerilli
This network shows the impact of papers produced by John Zerilli. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by John Zerilli. The network helps show where John Zerilli may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 6 scholars most cited alongside John Zerilli, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2018 | 194 | |
| 2 | How transparency modulates trust in artificial intelligence Hit paper breakdown → | 2022 | 91 |
| 3 | 2019 | 64 | |
| 4 | 2021 | 11 | |
| 5 | 2017 | 10 | |
| 6 | Government Use of Artificial Intelligence in New Zealand | 2019 | 9 |
| 7 | 2018 | 5 | |
| 8 | 2022 | 5 | |
| 9 | 2017 | 4 | |
| 10 | 2019 | 2 | |
| 11 | 2021 | 1 | |
| 12 | 2014 | 1 | |
| 13 | 2006 | 1 | |
| 14 | 2007 | 1 | |
| 15 | 2021 | 1 | |
| 16 | 2020 | 0 | |
| 17 | 2022 | 0 |
About John Zerilli
John Zerilli is a scholar working on Social Psychology, Cognitive Neuroscience, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Safety Research and Political Science and International Relations, having authored 17 papers that have together received 400 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Ethics and Social Impacts of AI (4 papers), Action Observation and Synchronization (3 papers), Embodied and Extended Cognition (3 papers), Legal Education and Practice Innovations (2 papers), Artificial Intelligence in Law (2 papers), Human-Automation Interaction and Safety (2 papers), Philosophy and Theoretical Science (2 papers) and Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI) (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Health Informatics (92 citations), Safety Research (198 citations), Artificial Intelligence (164 citations), General Decision Sciences (9 citations) and Cognitive Neuroscience (72 citations). John Zerilli has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Australia and New Zealand. Frequent co-authors include James Maclaurin, Alistair Knott, Colin Gavaghan, Adrian Weller, Umang Bhatt and John Danaher. Their work appears in journals such as Philosophy of Science, Synthese, Biology & Philosophy, Science and Philosophical Psychology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.