John Wright

440 citations
11 papers · 299 · h-index 8

Impact in

Papers in

John Wright

10 papers receiving 284 citations

Peers

John Wright
Comparison fields: 5 of 59
  • Safety Research 103
  • General Health Professions 92
  • Agronomy and Crop Science 33
  • Clinical Psychology 47
  • Sociology and Political Science 95
Replace Hayley Alderson with:
Hayley Alderson United Kingdom
Jennifer Sarah Tiffany United States
Robin Lindquist-Grantz United States
Emily M. Colpitts Canada
Susan L. Bissell United States
Charles Herbert Lea III United States
Beth Sapiro United States
Jo Murphy-Lawless Ireland
Helen Calabretto Australia
Aud Talle Norway
John Wright relative to Hayley Alderson United Kingdom Hayley Alderson's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10×20×26×
Hayley Alderson · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by John Wright

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of John Wright's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by John Wright with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites John Wright more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by John Wright

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by John Wright. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by John Wright. The network helps show where John Wright may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 20 scholars most cited alongside John Wright, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with John Wright Line = papers co-authored together John Wright links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

11 of 11 papers shown
#Work
1 2013107
2 200655
3 201433
4 201325
5 200722
6 197417
7 197217
8 201811
9 20177
10 19695
11 20240

About John Wright

John Wright is a scholar working on Safety Research, Agronomy and Crop Science, Genetics, Applied Psychology and General Health Professions, having authored 11 papers that have together received 299 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Genetic and phenotypic traits in livestock (3 papers), Ruminant Nutrition and Digestive Physiology (2 papers), Child Welfare and Adoption (2 papers), Family Support in Illness (2 papers), Healthcare innovation and challenges (1 paper), Reproductive Physiology in Livestock (1 paper), Milk Quality and Mastitis in Dairy Cows (1 paper) and Digital Mental Health Interventions (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Safety Research (103 citations), General Health Professions (92 citations), Agronomy and Crop Science (33 citations), Clinical Psychology (47 citations) and Sociology and Political Science (95 citations). John Wright has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Australia. Frequent co-authors include Duncan Moss, Rudi Dallos, Dana Beth Weinberg, Jody Hoffer Gittell, J. A. F. Rook, J. M. Forbes, Peter D. P. Wood, Alison M. Bacon, Jenni Murray and Rebecca Lawton. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Dairy Research, Children and Youth Services Review, Health Services Research, Clinical Psychology & Psychotherapy and Journal of Mental Health.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact