John Wright

3.4k citations
51 papers · 2.3k · h-index 18

Impact in

Papers in

John Wright

46 papers receiving 2.0k citations

Peers

John Wright
Comparison fields: 5 of 112
  • Public Administration 296
  • Strategy and Management 1.3k
  • Law 573
  • Political Science and International Relations 1.3k
  • Economics and Econometrics 668
Replace Brandice Canes‐Wrone with:
Brandice Canes‐Wrone United States
Sarah A. Binder United States
Lawrence S. Rothenberg United States
Marie Hojnacki United States
Kathleen Bawn United States
Víctor Lapuente Giné Sweden
Peverill Squire United States
David C. Kimball United States
Paul Brace United States
Sean Gailmard United States
John Wright relative to Brandice Canes‐Wrone United States Brandice Canes‐Wrone's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×1.9×
Brandice Canes‐Wrone · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by John Wright

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of John Wright's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by John Wright with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites John Wright more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by John Wright

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by John Wright. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by John Wright. The network helps show where John Wright may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside John Wright, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with John Wright Line = papers co-authored together John Wright links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 51 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1990326
2 1988314
3 1994298
4 1985199
5 2001155
6 1996138
7 1990137
8 1989111
9 201282
10 199879
11 198360
12 199054
13 200053
14 200442
15 198337
16 198734
17 200730
18 197224
19 200216
20 199016

About John Wright

John Wright is a scholar working on Political Science and International Relations, Economics and Econometrics, Strategy and Management, Law and Anthropology, having authored 51 papers that have together received 2.3k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Political Influence and Corporate Strategies (13 papers), Electoral Systems and Political Participation (12 papers), Judicial and Constitutional Studies (11 papers), Legal and Constitutional Studies (7 papers), Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems (5 papers), Public Policy and Administration Research (5 papers), Game Theory and Voting Systems (3 papers) and Cultural Heritage Management and Preservation (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Public Administration (296 citations), Strategy and Management (1.3k citations), Law (573 citations), Political Science and International Relations (1.3k citations) and Economics and Econometrics (668 citations). John Wright has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Czechia and Germany. Frequent co-authors include Gregory A. Caldeira, David Austen‐Smith, Steven J. Balla, Richard G. Niemi, Keith Krehbiel, Alan E. Wiseman, Marie Hojnacki, Peverill Squire, Aron Mazel and Gaile Pohlhaus. Their work appears in journals such as American Journal of Political Science, American Political Science Review, The Journal of Politics, Legislative Studies Quarterly and Metrologia.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact