John Watts

49 papers receiving 674 citations

Peers

John Watts
Comparison fields: 5 of 121
  • Microbiology 11
  • Library and Information Sciences 14
  • Small Animals 65
  • Endocrinology 45
  • Infectious Diseases 125
Replace Sarika Jain with:
Sarika Jain United States
Samuel Ackerman United States
Karolyn A. Wanat United States
R. Grubb Sweden
Ben G. Marshall United Kingdom
Chris Bird United Kingdom
Ming Guan China
Jane Meisel United States
Darawan Rinchai United States
R J Booth New Zealand
John Watts relative to Sarika Jain United States Sarika Jain's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2.7×
Sarika Jain · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by John Watts

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of John Watts's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by John Watts with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites John Watts more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by John Watts

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by John Watts. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by John Watts. The network helps show where John Watts may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside John Watts, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with John Watts Line = papers co-authored together John Watts links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 54 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1
Pathologic diagnosis of fungal infections
198796
2 197175
3 200158
4 199453
5 198044
6 198434
7 200326
8 198526
9 198823
10 200120
11 196219
12 198518
13 199016
14 200015
15 197614
16 197513
17 201513
18 197512
19 201211
20 198811

About John Watts

John Watts is a scholar working on Infectious Diseases, Surgery, Epidemiology, Information Systems and Parasitology, having authored 54 papers that have together received 733 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Antifungal resistance and susceptibility (5 papers), Fungal Infections and Studies (3 papers), Scientific Computing and Data Management (3 papers), Infectious Diseases and Mycology (3 papers), Research Data Management Practices (3 papers), Cardiac tumors and thrombi (2 papers), Data Quality and Management (2 papers) and Library Science and Administration (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Microbiology (11 citations), Library and Information Sciences (14 citations), Small Animals (65 citations), Endocrinology (45 citations) and Infectious Diseases (125 citations). John Watts has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Canada and Italy. Frequent co-authors include Francis W. Chandler, Neal S. Goldstein, W. W. Prichard, Paul E. Aldrich, Walter Meier, Robert J. Lucas, Lester J. Layfield, Allen M. Gown, Hadi Yaziji and Jose A. Gonzalez. Their work appears in journals such as American Journal of Clinical Pathology, portal Libraries and the Academy, Human Pathology, Archives of Pathology & Laboratory Medicine and Reference Services Review.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact