John W. Loop

853 citations
38 papers · 696 · h-index 14

Impact in

  • Neurology top 5%
    • Traumatic Brain Injury and Neurovascular Disturbances
    • Intracranial Aneurysms: Treatment and Complications

Papers in

John W. Loop

36 papers receiving 559 citations

Peers

John W. Loop
Comparison fields: 5 of 107
  • Neurology 186
  • Emergency Medicine 42
  • Surgery 205
  • Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging 103
  • Medical Laboratory Technology 7
Replace S Heyman with:
S Heyman United States
Sydney Heyman United States
Reynold F. Brown United States
I. P. C. Murray Australia
David M. Witten United States
Hirotsugu Munechika Japan
Gökçe Kaan Ataç Türkiye
Shima Aran United States
W. Hruby Austria
L Zaremba United States
John W. Loop relative to S Heyman United States S Heyman's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.5×
S Heyman · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by John W. Loop

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of John W. Loop's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by John W. Loop with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites John W. Loop more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by John W. Loop

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by John W. Loop. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by John W. Loop. The network helps show where John W. Loop may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside John W. Loop, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with John W. Loop Line = papers co-authored together John W. Loop links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 38 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1971174
2 197356
3 199053
4 196448
5 196440
6 196638
7 197332
8 198332
9 197826
10 197222
11 198919
12 197718
13 199014
14 197614
15 196411
16 197510
17
CT ScoutView for skull fracture: substitute for skull films?
19828
18 19758
19 19897
20 19657

About John W. Loop

John W. Loop is a scholar working on Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, Neurology, Surgery and Epidemiology, having authored 38 papers that have together received 696 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Radiology practices and education (11 papers), Digital Radiography and Breast Imaging (9 papers), Radiation Dose and Imaging (7 papers), Traumatic Brain Injury and Neurovascular Disturbances (4 papers), Advanced X-ray and CT Imaging (3 papers), Acute Ischemic Stroke Management (3 papers), Neurosurgical Procedures and Complications (2 papers) and Fetal and Pediatric Neurological Disorders (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Neurology (186 citations), Emergency Medicine (42 citations), Surgery (205 citations), Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging (103 citations) and Medical Laboratory Technology (7 citations). John W. Loop has collaborated with scholars based in United States and Canada. Frequent co-authors include Eldon L. Foltz, G.E.M. Hall, Gerald R. Smith, C M Shaw, Lucile E. White, Gilbert S. Omenn, L A Mack, David R. Haynor, R F Kilcoyne and H A King. Their work appears in journals such as Radiology, American Journal of Roentgenology, Journal of Digital Imaging, New England Journal of Medicine and Neurology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact