John W. Lee

39 papers receiving 588 citations

Peers

John W. Lee
Comparison fields: 5 of 142
  • Numerical Analysis 59
  • Modeling and Simulation 41
  • Applied Psychology 35
  • Applied Mathematics 69
  • Mathematical Physics 58
Replace Daniel C. Lewis with:
Daniel C. Lewis United States
Leonid Kalachev United States
Alfred Schmidt Germany
Katarzyna Sznajd-Weron Poland
Michael A. B. Deakin Australia
Pauline Vos Norway
Joseph B. Keller United States
Juan Bory Reyes Cuba
Herbert A. Meyer Germany
Marcus Tullius Cıcero United States
John W. Lee relative to Daniel C. Lewis United States Daniel C. Lewis's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10.3×
Daniel C. Lewis · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by John W. Lee

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of John W. Lee's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by John W. Lee with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites John W. Lee more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by John W. Lee

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by John W. Lee. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by John W. Lee. The network helps show where John W. Lee may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside John W. Lee, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with John W. Lee Line = papers co-authored together John W. Lee links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 42 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1
Partial differential equations of mathematical physics and integral equations
1996215
2 2009109
3 197151
4 201237
5 199035
6 200025
7 199120
8 198919
9 198517
10 19899
11 19899
12 20228
13 19748
14
Existence results for differential equations in Banach spaces
19937
15 20087
16 19707
17 20186
18 19715
19 19824
20 20034

About John W. Lee

John W. Lee is a scholar working on Numerical Analysis, Molecular Biology, Applied Mathematics, Ocean Engineering and Accounting, having authored 42 papers that have together received 640 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Differential Equations and Numerical Methods (6 papers), Numerical methods for differential equations (4 papers), Reservoir Engineering and Simulation Methods (4 papers), Hydraulic Fracturing and Reservoir Analysis (4 papers), Drilling and Well Engineering (3 papers), Nonlinear Differential Equations Analysis (3 papers), Spectral Theory in Mathematical Physics (3 papers) and Differential Equations and Boundary Problems (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Numerical Analysis (59 citations), Modeling and Simulation (41 citations), Applied Psychology (35 citations), Applied Mathematics (69 citations) and Mathematical Physics (58 citations). John W. Lee has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Ireland and Canada. Frequent co-authors include Ronald B. Guenther, Joanne V. Wood, W. Q. Elaine Perunovic, Donal O’Regan, Milton J. Cormier, Kazuo Hori, John E. Wampler, Duane A. McVay, P. M. Anselone and Hiroyuki Sugiyama. Their work appears in journals such as Nonlinear Analysis, The Journal of Chemical Physics, Journal of Fixed Point Theory and Applications, Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Linear Algebra and its Applications.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact