John W. Hawks

22 papers receiving 321 citations

Peers

John W. Hawks
Comparison fields: 5 of 49
  • Sensory Systems 126
  • Speech and Hearing 74
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 194
  • Linguistics and Language 35
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 95
Replace Jae Hee Lee with:
Jae Hee Lee United States
David C. Bennett United States
Jason McKeown United Kingdom
Benjamin Sheffield United States
Elizabeth G. Reynolds United States
Terrin N. Tamati United States
Jungmee Lee United States
Sandeep A. Phatak United States
Anita Wagner Netherlands
John C. G. M. van Rooij Netherlands
John W. Hawks relative to Jae Hee Lee United States Jae Hee Lee's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×4.4×
Jae Hee Lee · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by John W. Hawks

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of John W. Hawks's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by John W. Hawks with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites John W. Hawks more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by John W. Hawks

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by John W. Hawks. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by John W. Hawks. The network helps show where John W. Hawks may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside John W. Hawks, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with John W. Hawks Line = papers co-authored together John W. Hawks links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 23 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2016100
2 199548
3 199440
4 200633
5 200524
6 200715
7 200412
8 200811
9 202011
10 199711
11 20229
12 19958
13 19974
14
The Virginia Health Outcomes Project: A Unique Approach to Lowering Medicaid Costs and Improving Health Outcomes
19953
15 19953
16 19993
17
Perceptual aspects of a three-dimensional vowel space
19902
18 19981
19 20071
20 19981

About John W. Hawks

John W. Hawks is a scholar working on Cognitive Neuroscience, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Signal Processing, Speech and Hearing and Sensory Systems, having authored 23 papers that have together received 343 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Hearing Loss and Rehabilitation (12 papers), Phonetics and Phonology Research (7 papers), Speech and Audio Processing (7 papers), Noise Effects and Management (4 papers), Hearing, Cochlea, Tinnitus, Genetics (4 papers), Linguistic Variation and Morphology (3 papers), Multisensory perception and integration (1 paper) and Hearing Impairment and Communication (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Sensory Systems (126 citations), Speech and Hearing (74 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (194 citations), Linguistics and Language (35 citations) and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (95 citations). John W. Hawks has collaborated with scholars based in United States, China and Greece. Frequent co-authors include James D. Miller, Marios Fourakis, Jianxin Bao, Jennifer Liu, Colleen G. Le Prell, Laura K. Holden, Timothy A. Holden, Margaret W. Skinner, M. L. Hyde and Vasiliki Iliadou. Their work appears in journals such as The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, Journal of the American Academy of Audiology, The American Journal of Managed Care, International Journal of Audiology and Language and Speech.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact