John W. Foreman

68 papers receiving 1.7k citations

Peers

John W. Foreman
Comparison fields: 5 of 138
  • Nephrology 261
  • Biochemistry 245
  • Pathology and Forensic Medicine 345
  • Rheumatology 275
  • Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health 337
Replace R.L. Pisoni with:
R.L. Pisoni United States
James A. Pitcock United States
Abolfazl Zarjou United States
Stephen Adler United States
Eeva‐Riitta Savolainen Finland
Yi-An Ko United States
Hua Zhou China
Yoichi Miyazaki Japan
Shan Mou China
Amie Traylor United States
John W. Foreman relative to R.L. Pisoni United States R.L. Pisoni's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2.8×
R.L. Pisoni · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by John W. Foreman

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of John W. Foreman's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by John W. Foreman with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites John W. Foreman more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by John W. Foreman

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by John W. Foreman. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by John W. Foreman. The network helps show where John W. Foreman may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside John W. Foreman, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with John W. Foreman Line = papers co-authored together John W. Foreman links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 70 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1992353
2 2012121
3 200075
4 198163
5 201063
6 200063
7 201860
8 200859
9 201459
10 198057
11 198156
12 198256
13
A pilot clinical study of retrograde oxygen persufflation in renal preservation.
198943
14 198041
15 198838
16 199634
17 198733
18 199529
19
Data Smart: Using Data Science to Transform Information into Insight
201326
20 198926

About John W. Foreman

John W. Foreman is a scholar working on Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health, Pathology and Forensic Medicine, Biochemistry, Molecular Biology and Nephrology, having authored 70 papers that have together received 1.8k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Biomedical Research and Pathophysiology (19 papers), Amino Acid Enzymes and Metabolism (19 papers), Neonatal Health and Biochemistry (14 papers), Ion Transport and Channel Regulation (9 papers), Metabolism and Genetic Disorders (8 papers), Pediatric Urology and Nephrology Studies (7 papers), Drug Transport and Resistance Mechanisms (5 papers) and Sugarcane Cultivation and Processing (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Nephrology (261 citations), Biochemistry (245 citations), Pathology and Forensic Medicine (345 citations), Rheumatology (275 citations) and Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health (337 citations). John W. Foreman has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Australia and Canada. Frequent co-authors include Stanton Segal, Delbert R. Wigfall, Craig T. Przysiecki, Joseph R. Sherbotie, David J. Miner, William J. VanDusen, Michael D. Clayman, Eric G. Neilson, Hiroshi Shiraga and Karl S. Roth. Their work appears in journals such as The Journal of Pediatrics, Pediatric Research, Pediatric Nephrology, Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA) - Biomembranes and Metabolism.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact