John W. Dover

53 papers receiving 2.1k citations

Peers

John W. Dover
Comparison fields: 5 of 99
  • Ecological Modeling 412
  • Nature and Landscape Conservation 1.0k
  • Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics 920
  • Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis 551
  • Plant Science 767
Replace Marta Gaia Sperandii with:
Marta Gaia Sperandii Italy
Stuart W. Livingstone Canada
Moritz von der Lippe Germany
David Eichenberg Germany
Elizabeth le Roux South Africa
Nicole L. Kinlock United States
John W. Redhead United Kingdom
Alexandre Fadigas de Souza Brazil
Florence Dubs France
Bruno X. Pinho Brazil
John W. Dover relative to Marta Gaia Sperandii Italy Marta Gaia Sperandii's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×5×10×15×20×24×
Marta Gaia Sperandii · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by John W. Dover

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of John W. Dover's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by John W. Dover with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites John W. Dover more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by John W. Dover

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by John W. Dover. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by John W. Dover. The network helps show where John W. Dover may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside John W. Dover, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with John W. Dover Line = papers co-authored together John W. Dover links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 55 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2008225
2 2017168
3 2018158
4 2018128
5 1997118
6 2000109
7 201297
8 200393
9 200490
10 199690
11 200888
12 200087
13 199070
14 201362
15 200159
16 199759
17 201852
18 200751
19 201045
20 201543

About John W. Dover

John W. Dover is a scholar working on Nature and Landscape Conservation, Ecological Modeling, Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis and Ecology, having authored 55 papers that have together received 2.3k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies (25 papers), Plant and animal studies (16 papers), Species Distribution and Climate Change (12 papers), Land Use and Ecosystem Services (6 papers), Botany and Plant Ecology Studies (6 papers), Plant responses to elevated CO2 (5 papers), Lepidoptera: Biology and Taxonomy (5 papers) and Urban Green Space and Health (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Ecological Modeling (412 citations), Nature and Landscape Conservation (1.0k citations), Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics (920 citations), Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis (551 citations) and Plant Science (767 citations). John W. Dover has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Spain and Norway. Frequent co-authors include Paul Mitchell, Kevin Reiling, Tim H. Sparks, Josef Settele, Alejandro J. Rescia, J.N. Greatorex-Davies, Gary L.A. Fry, Christine Schneider, Roger L. H. Dennis and Gareth L.A. Fry. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Insect Conservation, Urban forestry & urban greening, Agriculture Ecosystems & Environment, Entomologia Experimentalis et Applicata and Ecological Entomology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact