John W. Boyer

469 citations
22 papers · 157 · h-index 8

Impact in

Papers in

John W. Boyer

19 papers receiving 97 citations

Peers

John W. Boyer
Comparison fields: 5 of 38
  • History 52
  • Political Science and International Relations 94
  • General Psychology 3
  • Sociology and Political Science 92
  • History and Philosophy of Science 6
Replace Helen Fessenden with:
Helen Fessenden
G. Eley United States
John J. McTague United States
Blanche Wiesen Cook United States
David F. Crew United States
Benjamin Ziemann United Kingdom
John Pollard United Kingdom
Derek Beales United States
Brigitte Studer Switzerland
Susan R. Grayzel United States
John W. Boyer relative to Helen Fessenden Helen Fessenden's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.3×
Helen Fessenden · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by John W. Boyer

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of John W. Boyer's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by John W. Boyer with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites John W. Boyer more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by John W. Boyer

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by John W. Boyer. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by John W. Boyer. The network helps show where John W. Boyer may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 8 scholars most cited alongside John W. Boyer, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with John W. Boyer Line = papers co-authored together John W. Boyer links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 22 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 198252
2
Resistance against the Third Reich, 1933-1990
199420
3 201513
4 197811
5 20037
6 20137
7 19947
8
The University of Chicago: A History
20157
9 19837
10 19896
11 19865
12 20104
13 19923
14 19912
15
Nineteenth-century Europe : liberalism and its critics
19881
16
Karl Lueger (1844-1910) : christlichsoziale Politik als Beruf
20101
17 20221
18 20101
19 19861
20 19771

About John W. Boyer

John W. Boyer is a scholar working on Political Science and International Relations, Sociology and Political Science, History, Museology and Literature and Literary Theory, having authored 22 papers that have together received 157 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include European history and politics (9 papers), Central European national history (6 papers), European Political History Analysis (4 papers), Historical Geopolitical and Social Dynamics (3 papers), French Historical and Cultural Studies (2 papers), Religion, Theology, History, Judaism, Christianity (1 paper), Christian Theology and Mission (1 paper) and Law and Political Science (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in History (52 citations), Political Science and International Relations (94 citations), General Psychology (3 citations), Sociology and Political Science (92 citations) and History and Philosophy of Science (6 citations). John W. Boyer has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include William A. Jenks, Michaël Geyer, Gary B. Cohen, Julius Kirshner, Jan Goldstein, Jonathan Dewald, Stanley M. Burstein and Karl F. Morrison. Their work appears in journals such as The Journal of Modern History, The American Historical Review, Central European History, Austrian History Yearbook and University of Chicago Press eBooks.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact