John Vanderkamp

752 citations
32 papers · 546 · h-index 13

Impact in

Papers in

John Vanderkamp

27 papers receiving 384 citations

Peers

John Vanderkamp
Comparison fields: 5 of 35
  • Public Administration 48
  • Demography 78
  • Sociology and Political Science 328
  • General Economics, Econometrics and Finance 59
  • Economics and Econometrics 162
Replace Stephen M. Renas with:
Stephen M. Renas United States
James A. Dunlevy United States
Branko Horvat Serbia
Thomas F. Dernburg United States
Richard Jeffries United Kingdom
Kiren Aziz Chaudhry United States
Miguel Urrutia Colombia
Winfried Pfenning
Kurt Seebohm
Suzanne Paine United Kingdom
John Vanderkamp relative to Stephen M. Renas United States Stephen M. Renas's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×4×6×
Stephen M. Renas · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by John Vanderkamp

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of John Vanderkamp's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by John Vanderkamp with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites John Vanderkamp more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by John Vanderkamp

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by John Vanderkamp. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by John Vanderkamp. The network helps show where John Vanderkamp may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 9 scholars most cited alongside John Vanderkamp, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with John Vanderkamp Line = papers co-authored together John Vanderkamp links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 32 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1971125
2 198043
3 196839
4 197036
5 197234
6 197827
7
Repeat migration and disappointment.
198625
8 197222
9 197720
10 197018
11 196817
12 199117
13 197413
14 198512
15 196610
16 197510
17 197610
18 198710
19 19849
20 19898

About John Vanderkamp

John Vanderkamp is a scholar working on Economics and Econometrics, General Economics, Econometrics and Finance, Sociology and Political Science, Political Science and International Relations and Demography, having authored 32 papers that have together received 546 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Migration and Labor Dynamics (15 papers), Labor market dynamics and wage inequality (8 papers), Monetary Policy and Economic Impact (4 papers), Regional Economics and Spatial Analysis (3 papers), Local Government Finance and Decentralization (2 papers), Higher Education Governance and Development (2 papers), Regional Socio-Economic Development Trends (2 papers) and Unemployment and Economic Growth (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Public Administration (48 citations), Demography (78 citations), Sociology and Political Science (328 citations), General Economics, Econometrics and Finance (59 citations) and Economics and Econometrics (162 citations). John Vanderkamp has collaborated with scholars based in Canada. Frequent co-authors include Paul K. Gorecki, John R. Baldwin, Edwin G. West, Robert Swidinsky, Frank Flatters, Robin Boadway, Mark Blaug, Maurice H. Peston and Adrian Ziderman. Their work appears in journals such as Canadian Journal of Economics/Revue canadienne d économique, Canadian Public Policy, Economica, The Review of Economic Studies and Journal of Political Economy.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact