John Van Seters

2.3k citations
100 papers · 768 · h-index 16

Impact in

    • Biblical Studies and Interpretation
  • Archeology top 5%
    • Ancient Egypt and Archaeology
    • Ancient Near East History
    • Ancient Mediterranean Archaeology and History

Papers in

John Van Seters

72 papers receiving 386 citations

Peers

John Van Seters
Comparison fields: 5 of 38
  • Religious studies 617
  • Archeology 90
  • Classics 16
  • Philosophy 39
  • Anthropology 30
Replace James A. Sanders with:
James A. Sanders United States
Wilfred G.E. Watson United Kingdom
Victor Harold Matthews United States
Gary A. Rendsburg United States
Willem Cornelis Van Unnik Netherlands
Jacob Milgrom United States
John G. Gager United States
David J. A. Clines United Kingdom
John M. G. Barclay United Kingdom
David E. Aune United States
John Van Seters relative to James A. Sanders United States James A. Sanders's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×3×
James A. Sanders · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by John Van Seters

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of John Van Seters's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by John Van Seters with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites John Van Seters more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by John Van Seters

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by John Van Seters. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by John Van Seters. The network helps show where John Van Seters may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside John Van Seters, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with John Van Seters Line = papers co-authored together John Van Seters links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 100 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 199870
2 197751
3 198442
4 199541
5 196739
6 199638
7 200034
8 199633
9 199530
10 199026
11 196424
12 200423
13 200122
14 198619
15 199018
16 200217
17 200916
18 200214
19 197212
20 198312

About John Van Seters

John Van Seters is a scholar working on Religious studies, Archeology, Political Science and International Relations, Anthropology and Nuclear Energy and Engineering, having authored 100 papers that have together received 768 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Biblical Studies and Interpretation (94 papers), Ancient Egypt and Archaeology (5 papers), Religion, Theology, History, Judaism, Christianity (2 papers), Classical Antiquity Studies (1 paper) and Ancient Near East History (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Religious studies (617 citations), Archeology (90 citations), Classics (16 citations), Philosophy (39 citations) and Anthropology (30 citations). John Van Seters has collaborated with scholars based in Canada and United States. Frequent co-authors include Susan Niditch, J. J. M. Roberts, Joel S. Kaminsky, Alan Richard Schulman, Philip R. Davies, Victor Avigdor Hurowitz, David Damrosch, David P. Wright, Erhard Blum and Baruch Halpern. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Biblical Literature, Zeitschrift für die Alttestamentliche Wissenschaft, Scandinavian Journal of the Old Testament, Vetus Testamentum and The Journal of Egyptian Archaeology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact