John Marks

633 citations
15 papers · 151 · h-index 7

Impact in

    • Biblical Studies and Interpretation
  • Archeology top 5%
    • Archaeology and Historical Studies
    • Ancient Near East History
    • Ancient Egypt and Archaeology
    • Historical, Religious, and Philosophical Studies

Papers in

    • Biblical Studies and Interpretation 7
    • Archaeology and Historical Studies 5
    • Historical, Religious, and Philosophical Studies 1

John Marks

10 papers receiving 106 citations

Peers

John Marks
Comparison fields: 5 of 63
  • Religious studies 49
  • Archeology 63
  • Classics 11
  • Anthropology 23
  • Space and Planetary Science 2
Replace Gedaliahu A. G. Stroumsa with:
Gedaliahu A. G. Stroumsa United Kingdom
Naomi Janowitz United States
Bentley Layton United States
Kurt Rudolph Germany
Thomas M. Bolin United States
Barbara Aland
Doron Mendels Israel
Philip S. Alexander United Kingdom
Geo Widengren
E. A. Wallis Budge
John Marks relative to Gedaliahu A. G. Stroumsa United Kingdom Gedaliahu A. G. Stroumsa's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.5×
Gedaliahu A. G. Stroumsa · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by John Marks

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of John Marks's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by John Marks with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites John Marks more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by John Marks

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by John Marks. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by John Marks. The network helps show where John Marks may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 9 scholars most cited alongside John Marks, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with John Marks Line = papers co-authored together John Marks links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

15 of 15 papers shown
#Work
1 199637
2 198433
3 198130
4 197515
5 197914
6 19909
7 19646
8 19854
9 19862
10 19651
11 19980
12 20060
13 19590
14 20190
15 20060

About John Marks

John Marks is a scholar working on Religious studies, Archeology, Sociology and Political Science, Philosophy and Political Science and International Relations, having authored 15 papers that have together received 151 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Biblical Studies and Interpretation (7 papers), Archaeology and Historical Studies (5 papers), Philosophy, Ethics, and Existentialism (2 papers), Classical Antiquity Studies (1 paper), Islamic Studies and History (1 paper), Historical and Linguistic Studies (1 paper), Jewish and Middle Eastern Studies (1 paper) and Historical, Religious, and Philosophical Studies (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Religious studies (49 citations), Archeology (63 citations), Classics (11 citations), Anthropology (23 citations) and Space and Planetary Science (2 citations). Frequent co-authors include John Van Seters, H. J. W. Drijvers, Constantin Boundas, Dorothea Olkowski, Javier Teixidor, J. Alberto Soggin, William D. Davies, Bruce Bernstein and Louis Finkelstein. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Biblical Literature, The American Historical Review, Paragraph, IEEE Electrical Insulation Magazine and The Modern Language Review.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact