John T. Singleton
Impact in
- Organic Chemistry top 5%
- Organometallic Complex Synthesis and Catalysis
- Catalytic Cross-Coupling Reactions
- Catalytic C–H Functionalization Methods
- Sulfur-Based Synthesis Techniques
- Chemical Synthesis and Reactions
- Coordination Chemistry and Organometallics
Papers in
-
- Synthetic Organic Chemistry Methods 3
- Catalytic C–H Functionalization Methods 1
- Synthesis of heterocyclic compounds 1
- Asymmetric Synthesis and Catalysis 1
- Cyclopropane Reaction Mechanisms 1
-
- Fluorine in Organic Chemistry 1
- Co-authors
- Eric Merifield (3 shared papers)Alison C. Foster (2 shared papers)Robert Nixon (1 shared paper)Marie‐Lyne Alcaraz (1 shared paper)Duncan Michael Gill (1 shared paper)Kevin R. Anderson (1 shared paper)Takaji Matsumoto (1 shared paper)Gareth J. Rowlands (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- Organic Process Research & Development (4 papers)Tetrahedron (1 paper)Journal of Chemical Research (1 paper)Journal of Heterocyclic Chemistry (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United KingdomBrazilJapan
In The Last Decade
John T. Singleton
7 papers receiving 731 citations
John T. Singleton's Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 48
- Organic Chemistry 685
- Process Chemistry and Technology 65
- Inorganic Chemistry 286
- Toxicology 14
- Pharmaceutical Science 18
Countries citing papers authored by John T. Singleton
This map shows the geographic impact of John T. Singleton's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by John T. Singleton with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites John T. Singleton more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by John T. Singleton
This network shows the impact of papers produced by John T. Singleton. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by John T. Singleton. The network helps show where John T. Singleton may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 8 scholars most cited alongside John T. Singleton, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | The uses of pincer complexes in organic synthesis Hit paper breakdown → | 2003 | 581 |
| 2 | 2005 | 115 | |
| 3 | 2009 | 23 | |
| 4 | 2004 | 21 | |
| 5 | 2009 | 16 | |
| 6 | 2008 | 7 | |
| 7 | 2004 | 1 |
About John T. Singleton
John T. Singleton is a scholar working on Organic Chemistry, Pharmaceutical Science, Biotechnology, Spectroscopy and Molecular Biology, having authored 7 papers that have together received 764 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Synthetic Organic Chemistry Methods (3 papers), Chemical Synthesis and Analysis (3 papers), Catalytic C–H Functionalization Methods (1 paper), Synthesis of heterocyclic compounds (1 paper), Asymmetric Synthesis and Catalysis (1 paper), Cyclopropane Reaction Mechanisms (1 paper), Analytical Chemistry and Chromatography (1 paper) and Fluorine in Organic Chemistry (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Organic Chemistry (685 citations), Process Chemistry and Technology (65 citations), Inorganic Chemistry (286 citations), Toxicology (14 citations) and Pharmaceutical Science (18 citations). John T. Singleton has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Brazil and Japan. Frequent co-authors include Eric Merifield, Alison C. Foster, Robert Nixon, Marie‐Lyne Alcaraz, Duncan Michael Gill, Kevin R. Anderson, Takaji Matsumoto and Gareth J. Rowlands. Their work appears in journals such as Organic Process Research & Development, Tetrahedron, Journal of Chemical Research and Journal of Heterocyclic Chemistry.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.