John T. Howell
Impact in
- Health Informatics top 5%
- Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
-
- Electronic Health Records Systems
Papers in
-
- Electronic Health Records Systems 3
- Oncology 3
- Colorectal Cancer Screening and Detection 2
- Pancreatic and Hepatic Oncology Research 1
- Co-authors
- William C. Hanson (1 shared paper)Kevin B. Johnson (1 shared paper)Dylan S. Small (2 shared papers)Mitesh S. Patel (2 shared papers)Susan Day (2 shared papers)Kevin G. Volpp (1 shared paper)Knashawn H. Morales (3 shared papers)Tyra Bryant-Stephens (3 shared papers)
- Journals
- Applied Clinical Informatics (1 paper)Clinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology (1 paper)Annals of Internal Medicine (1 paper)JAMA Network Open (1 paper)Cytotherapy (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United States
In The Last Decade
John T. Howell
11 papers receiving 234 citations
John T. Howell's Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 39
- Health Informatics 31
- Health Information Management 27
- Family Practice 7
- Geriatrics and Gerontology 7
- General Health Professions 34
Countries citing papers authored by John T. Howell
This map shows the geographic impact of John T. Howell's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by John T. Howell with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites John T. Howell more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by John T. Howell
This network shows the impact of papers produced by John T. Howell. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by John T. Howell. The network helps show where John T. Howell may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside John T. Howell, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Clinician Experiences With Ambient Scribe Technology to Assist With Documentation Burden and Efficiency Hit paper breakdown → | 2025 | 74 |
| 2 | 2014 | 57 | |
| 3 | 2022 | 28 | |
| 4 | 2019 | 26 | |
| 5 | 2015 | 19 | |
| 6 | 2019 | 12 | |
| 7 | 2016 | 8 | |
| 8 | 2020 | 4 | |
| 9 | 2022 | 3 | |
| 10 | Implementing OPCAT in Australia 2020 | 2020 | 3 |
| 11 | 2015 | 1 | |
| 12 | 2021 | 0 |
About John T. Howell
John T. Howell is a scholar working on Health Information Management, Oncology, Infectious Diseases, Dermatology and General Health Professions, having authored 12 papers that have together received 235 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Electronic Health Records Systems (3 papers), Colorectal Cancer Screening and Detection (2 papers), Dermatological and COVID-19 studies (1 paper), COVID-19 Clinical Research Studies (1 paper), Pancreatic and Hepatic Oncology Research (1 paper), Health Literacy and Information Accessibility (1 paper), Digital Mental Health Interventions (1 paper) and Biomedical and Engineering Education (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Health Informatics (31 citations), Health Information Management (27 citations), Family Practice (7 citations), Geriatrics and Gerontology (7 citations) and General Health Professions (34 citations). John T. Howell has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include William C. Hanson, Kevin B. Johnson, Dylan S. Small, Mitesh S. Patel, Susan Day, Kevin G. Volpp, Knashawn H. Morales, Tyra Bryant-Stephens, Andrea Apter and Luzmercy Perez. Their work appears in journals such as Applied Clinical Informatics, Clinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Annals of Internal Medicine, JAMA Network Open and Cytotherapy.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.