John Stenhouse

864 citations
30 papers · 181 · h-index 8

Impact in

    • History of Science and Natural History
    • Evolution and Science Education
  • History top 10%
    • Historical Studies on Reproduction, Gender, Health, and Societal Changes

Papers in

John Stenhouse

22 papers receiving 110 citations

Peers

John Stenhouse
Comparison fields: 5 of 52
  • History and Philosophy of Science 53
  • History 32
  • Geography, Planning and Development 16
  • Anthropology 25
  • Sociology and Political Science 82
Replace Hue-Tam Ho Tai with:
Hue-Tam Ho Tai United States
Gregory Blue Canada
Priya Satia United States
Stéphane Audoin-Rouzeau France
Matthew P. Fitzpatrick Australia
Julius R. Ruff United States
Patrick Boucheron France
Philip Dwyer Australia
Philip F. Riley United States
Cornélius J. Jaenen Canada
John Stenhouse relative to Hue-Tam Ho Tai United States Hue-Tam Ho Tai's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.6×
Hue-Tam Ho Tai · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by John Stenhouse

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of John Stenhouse's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by John Stenhouse with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites John Stenhouse more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by John Stenhouse

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by John Stenhouse. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by John Stenhouse. The network helps show where John Stenhouse may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 6 scholars most cited alongside John Stenhouse, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with John Stenhouse Line = papers co-authored together John Stenhouse links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 30 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 199937
2 201729
3 200718
4 200116
5 199913
6 200011
7
Christianity, modernity and culture : new perspectives on New Zealand history
20058
8 19987
9 19906
10
God and government : the New Zealand experience
20006
11 20055
12
Building God's own country : historical essays on religions in New Zealand
20044
13 20193
14 19982
15 20212
16 19932
17 19942
18 20112
19 20062
20 20221

About John Stenhouse

John Stenhouse is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, History and Philosophy of Science, Anthropology, Economics and Econometrics and History, having authored 30 papers that have together received 181 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Evolution and Science Education (7 papers), History of Science and Natural History (6 papers), Australian History and Society (5 papers), New Zealand Economic and Social Studies (4 papers), Medical History and Research (3 papers), American Constitutional Law and Politics (3 papers), Australian Indigenous Culture and History (3 papers) and Environmental, Ecological, and Cultural Studies (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in History and Philosophy of Science (53 citations), History (32 citations), Geography, Planning and Development (16 citations), Anthropology (25 citations) and Sociology and Political Science (82 citations). John Stenhouse has collaborated with scholars based in New Zealand, United States and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Ronald L. Numbers, Hamish G. Spencer, Diane Β. Paul, James Beattie, Paul Jerome Croce and Rex Ahdar. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Religious History, Environment and History, The British Journal for the History of Science, The American Historical Review and The Quarterly Review of Biology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact