Environment and History

573 papers and 4.3k indexed citations i.

About

The 573 papers published in Environment and History in the last decades have received a total of 4.3k indexed citations. Papers published in Environment and History usually cover Sociology and Political Science (139 papers), Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law (105 papers) and Anthropology (85 papers) specifically the topics of American Environmental and Regional History (70 papers), Conservation, Biodiversity, and Resource Management (44 papers) and Geographies of human-animal interactions (36 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Environment and History are Christian A. Kull, Nancy Lee Peluso, Peter Vandergeest, Greg Bankoff, J. Fairbairn, A.S. Mather, James Beattie, E Swyngedouw, Stephen Dovers and Richard C. Hoffmann.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Environment and History

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Environment and History. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Environment and History.

Countries where authors publish in Environment and History

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Environment and History. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Environment and History with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Environment and History more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025