John Sitter

975 citations
30 papers · 342 · h-index 10

Impact in

Papers in

    • Literature: history, themes, analysis 7
    • Poetry Analysis and Criticism 3
    • Ecocriticism and Environmental Literature 3
    • Folklore, Mythology, and Literature Studies 2

John Sitter

26 papers receiving 205 citations

Peers

John Sitter
Comparison fields: 5 of 61
  • Literature and Literary Theory 153
  • Classics 47
  • History 84
  • Museology 24
  • Anthropology 46
Replace Dorothy Wordsworth with:
Dorothy Wordsworth Canada
Henry Fielding
James Grantham Turner United States
Ann Jefferson United Kingdom
J. W. Tibble United Kingdom
Margaret Aston United Kingdom
Hartmut Böhme Germany
Thomas William Heyck United States
Paul Christianson Canada
Robert Frost United Kingdom
John Sitter relative to Dorothy Wordsworth Canada Dorothy Wordsworth's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×11×
Dorothy Wordsworth · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by John Sitter

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of John Sitter's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by John Sitter with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites John Sitter more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by John Sitter

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by John Sitter. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by John Sitter. The network helps show where John Sitter may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 17 scholars most cited alongside John Sitter, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with John Sitter Line = papers co-authored together John Sitter links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 30 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 198288
2 200142
3 202132
4 197727
5 198723
6 197819
7 199117
8 200715
9 201415
10 201213
11 20119
12 19919
13 20116
14 19805
15 20074
16 19744
17 20052
18 19892
19 19972
20 20012

About John Sitter

John Sitter is a scholar working on Literature and Literary Theory, History, Political Science and International Relations, Sociology and Political Science and Classics, having authored 30 papers that have together received 342 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Literature: history, themes, analysis (7 papers), Poetry Analysis and Criticism (3 papers), Ecocriticism and Environmental Literature (3 papers), Medieval Literature and History (2 papers), Folklore, Mythology, and Literature Studies (2 papers), American Constitutional Law and Politics (2 papers), Language, Metaphor, and Cognition (2 papers) and Literature Analysis and Criticism (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Literature and Literary Theory (153 citations), Classics (47 citations), History (84 citations), Museology (24 citations) and Anthropology (46 citations). John Sitter has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include David Fairer, James A. Winn, Claude Rawson, Howard Erskine‐Hill, Howard D. Weinbrot, Malcolm Kelsall, Pat Rogers, Paul Baines, James McLaverty and D. James Nokes. Their work appears in journals such as ISLE Interdisciplinary Studies in Literature and Environment, Eighteenth-Century Studies, Green Letters, ELH and Huntington Library Quarterly.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact