John S. King

151 papers receiving 6.0k citations

John S. King's Hit Papers

Forest response to elevated CO2is conserved across a broad range of productivity 2005 · 786 citations
7860+7+14Years since publication250500750

Peers

John S. King
Comparison fields: 5 of 114
  • Global and Planetary Change 3.3k
  • Soil Science 1.4k
  • Nature and Landscape Conservation 1.3k
  • Atmospheric Science 1.2k
  • Plant Science 1.7k
Replace Gioṙgio Matteucci with:
Gioṙgio Matteucci Italy
Xianzhou Zhang China
R. F. Grant Canada
Hongsong Chen China
Hiroshi Koizumi Japan
J. H. M. Thornley United Kingdom
Zhenzhu Xu China
Thomas W. Boutton United States
Mark A. Adams Australia
G. M. Marion United States
John S. King relative to Gioṙgio Matteucci Italy Gioṙgio Matteucci's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Gioṙgio Matteucci · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by John S. King

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of John S. King's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by John S. King with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites John S. King more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by John S. King

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by John S. King. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by John S. King. The network helps show where John S. King may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside John S. King, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with John S. King Line = papers co-authored together John S. King links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 156 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1
Forest response to elevated CO2is conserved across a broad range of productivity
Hit paper breakdown →
2005786
2 2000407
3 2012344
4 1971252
5 2002240
6 1974203
7 2015178
8 2009163
9 2001151
10 2010145
11 2004134
12 2009124
13 2008124
14 2009122
15 199991
16 200487
17 198580
18 200976
19 201274
20 201372

About John S. King

John S. King is a scholar working on Global and Planetary Change, Atmospheric Science, Ecology, Plant Science and Nature and Landscape Conservation, having authored 156 papers that have together received 6.3k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Plant Water Relations and Carbon Dynamics (62 papers), Peatlands and Wetlands Ecology (22 papers), Forest ecology and management (22 papers), Bioenergy crop production and management (21 papers), Nuclear Physics and Applications (20 papers), Soil Carbon and Nitrogen Dynamics (19 papers), Tree-ring climate responses (17 papers) and Plant responses to elevated CO2 (17 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Global and Planetary Change (3.3k citations), Soil Science (1.4k citations), Nature and Landscape Conservation (1.3k citations), Atmospheric Science (1.2k citations) and Plant Science (1.7k citations). John S. King has collaborated with scholars based in United States, France and Belgium. Frequent co-authors include Kurt S. Pregitzer, Jean‐Christophe Domec, Asko Noormets, Steven G. McNulty, Ge Sun, Andrew J. Burton, Michael Gavazzi, Donald R. Zak, Shannon E. Brown and Christian P. Giardina. Their work appears in journals such as Agricultural and Forest Meteorology, Tree Physiology, The Journal of Chemical Physics, Forest Ecology and Management and Forests.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact