John Robert Phillips

61 papers receiving 3.7k citations

Peers

John Robert Phillips
Comparison fields: 5 of 128
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 1.6k
  • Epidemiology 1.2k
  • Ophthalmology 219
  • Nutrition and Dietetics 248
  • Human-Computer Interaction 63
Replace John L. Barbur with:
John L. Barbur United Kingdom
Ian J. Murray United Kingdom
Ji‐Soo Kim South Korea
Gislin Dagnelie United States
Vaegan Australia
David Chen United States
Simon Fristed Eskildsen Denmark
Bernard Gilmartin United Kingdom
Štingl Katarina Germany
Sung‐Rae Cho South Korea
John Robert Phillips relative to John L. Barbur United Kingdom John L. Barbur's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10×20×30×35.4×
John L. Barbur · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by John Robert Phillips

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of John Robert Phillips's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by John Robert Phillips with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites John Robert Phillips more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by John Robert Phillips

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by John Robert Phillips. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by John Robert Phillips. The network helps show where John Robert Phillips may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside John Robert Phillips, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with John Robert Phillips Line = papers co-authored together John Robert Phillips links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 62 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1981431
2 2011344
3 1981269
4 1990256
5 1995223
6 1981215
7 1996211
8
Induced myopia associated with increased scleral creep in chick and tree shrew eyes.
2000161
9 1992139
10 1988137
11 1990120
12 2015118
13 1995100
14 200186
15 201780
16 200578
17 200462
18 198360
19 201753
20 198848

About John Robert Phillips

John Robert Phillips is a scholar working on Epidemiology, Cognitive Neuroscience, Ophthalmology, Nutrition and Dietetics and Oral Surgery, having authored 62 papers that have together received 3.9k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Ophthalmology and Visual Impairment Studies (34 papers), Tactile and Sensory Interactions (15 papers), Retinal Development and Disorders (3 papers), Glaucoma and retinal disorders (3 papers), Retinal Diseases and Treatments (3 papers), Ophthalmology and Visual Health Research (2 papers), Ocular Surface and Contact Lens (2 papers) and Food composition and properties (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Cognitive Neuroscience (1.6k citations), Epidemiology (1.2k citations), Ophthalmology (219 citations), Nutrition and Dietetics (248 citations) and Human-Computer Interaction (63 citations). John Robert Phillips has collaborated with scholars based in New Zealand, United States and Australia. Frequent co-authors include Kenneth O. Johnson, Ken Johnson, Nicola S. Anstice, Simon Backhouse, Philip Turnbull, Roland S. Johansson, Neville A. McBrien, Kerin O’Dea, Helen Owens and Steven S. Hsiao. Their work appears in journals such as Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science, Ophthalmic and Physiological Optics, Journal of Neurophysiology, Journal of Neuroscience and Optometry and Vision Science.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact