John Rees

1.7k citations
61 papers · 1.4k · h-index 23

Impact in

Papers in

John Rees

55 papers receiving 1.2k citations

Peers

John Rees
Comparison fields: 5 of 120
  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine 390
  • Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging 308
  • Family Practice 17
  • Nephrology 58
  • Neurology 81
Replace Donald O. Nutter with:
Donald O. Nutter United States
Víctor A. López United States
İzzet Tandoğan Türkiye
Peter Lechleitner Austria
Amos Pines Israel
Samuel Zoneraich United States
Homayoun Kazemi United States
John A. Crane United States
Gautam Kumar United States
John Skoularigis Greece
John Rees relative to Donald O. Nutter United States Donald O. Nutter's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
Donald O. Nutter · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by John Rees

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of John Rees's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by John Rees with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites John Rees more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by John Rees

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by John Rees. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by John Rees. The network helps show where John Rees may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside John Rees, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with John Rees Line = papers co-authored together John Rees links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 61 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1964211
2
Hepatic retrojection. A technique for investigating the local action of substances on the human liver.
1961126
3 199963
4 200560
5 200456
6 196754
7 198954
8 197143
9 195840
10 199337
11 196437
12 198631
13 196930
14 198930
15 199829
16 201828
17 200627
18 198727
19 200524
20 196824

About John Rees

John Rees is a scholar working on Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, Surgery, Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine and Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, having authored 61 papers that have together received 1.4k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Cardiac Imaging and Diagnostics (11 papers), Advanced MRI Techniques and Applications (7 papers), Medical Education and Admissions (4 papers), Innovations in Medical Education (4 papers), Cardiac electrophysiology and arrhythmias (3 papers), Cardiac, Anesthesia and Surgical Outcomes (3 papers), Heart Rate Variability and Autonomic Control (3 papers) and Dental Education, Practice, Research (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine (390 citations), Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging (308 citations), Family Practice (17 citations), Nephrology (58 citations) and Neurology (81 citations). John Rees has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Canada. Frequent co-authors include Margaret Johnson, J S Cameron, Heidi Lempp, Mac Cochrane, Keiji Ueda, Richard S. Ross, P. R. Lichtlen, Kevin S. Channer, Mary Seabrook and Martin James. Their work appears in journals such as The Lancet, Heart, Cardiovascular Research, American Heart Journal and Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact