Jack Lively
Impact in
- History top 2%
- European Political History Analysis
-
- Political Theory and Influence
- American Constitutional Law and Politics
- Political Philosophy and Ethics
Papers in
-
- Political Theory and Influence 3
- American Constitutional Law and Politics 1
-
- Historical Studies and Socio-cultural Analysis 2
- Co-authors
- John Rees (1 shared paper)James Mill (1 shared paper)Thomas Babington Macaulay Macaulay (1 shared paper)Joseph de Maistre (1 shared paper)Pierre Birnbaum (1 shared paper)Geraint Parry (1 shared paper)Andrew Reeve (2 shared papers)
- Journals
- Parliamentary Affairs (1 paper)History of European Ideas (1 paper)Utilitas (1 paper)Democratization (1 paper)Medical Entomology and Zoology (3 papers)
- Partner nations
- United Kingdom
In The Last Decade
Jack Lively
13 papers receiving 153 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 32
- History 91
- Political Science and International Relations 182
- Philosophy 57
- History and Philosophy of Science 11
- Religious studies 11
Countries citing papers authored by Jack Lively
This map shows the geographic impact of Jack Lively's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jack Lively with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jack Lively more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Jack Lively
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jack Lively. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jack Lively. The network helps show where Jack Lively may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 7 scholars most cited alongside Jack Lively, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Utilitarian Logic and Politics: James Mill's Essay on Government, MacAulay's Critique and the Ensuing Debate | 1996 | 63 |
| 2 | The social and political thought of Alexis de Tocqueville | 1962 | 49 |
| 3 | The works of Joseph de Maistre | 1971 | 44 |
| 4 | 1966 | 36 | |
| 5 | 1965 | 32 | |
| 6 | Democracy, consensus & social contract | 1978 | 11 |
| 7 | 1969 | 3 | |
| 8 | Democracy in Britain: A Reader | 1994 | 3 |
| 9 | 1997 | 2 | |
| 10 | 2013 | 2 | |
| 11 | 1981 | 2 | |
| 12 | 1979 | 2 | |
| 13 | 1967 | 1 | |
| 14 | 1990 | 0 |
About Jack Lively
Jack Lively is a scholar working on Political Science and International Relations, History and Philosophy of Science, Sociology and Political Science, Anthropology and Literature and Literary Theory, having authored 14 papers that have together received 250 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Political Theory and Influence (3 papers), Historical and Literary Studies (2 papers), Historical Studies and Socio-cultural Analysis (2 papers), Religion and Society Interactions (2 papers), Historical and Literary Analyses (1 paper), Judicial and Constitutional Studies (1 paper), Political Economy and Marxism (1 paper) and American Constitutional Law and Politics (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in History (91 citations), Political Science and International Relations (182 citations), Philosophy (57 citations), History and Philosophy of Science (11 citations) and Religious studies (11 citations). Jack Lively has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include John Rees, James Mill, Thomas Babington Macaulay Macaulay, Joseph de Maistre, Pierre Birnbaum, Geraint Parry and Andrew Reeve. Their work appears in journals such as Parliamentary Affairs, History of European Ideas, Utilitas, Democratization and Medical Entomology and Zoology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.