John Reed

537 citations
9 papers · 464 · h-index 6

Impact in

    • Arsenic contamination and mitigation
    • Cell death mechanisms and regulation
    • Retinoids in leukemia and cellular processes
    • Mitochondrial Function and Pathology
    • ATP Synthase and ATPases Research
    • RNA Interference and Gene Delivery

Papers in

John Reed

8 papers receiving 456 citations

Peers

John Reed
Comparison fields: 5 of 76
  • Environmental Chemistry 54
  • Molecular Biology 372
  • Biochemistry 24
  • Cancer Research 41
  • Physiology 11
Replace Mei‐yi Pu with:
Mei‐yi Pu Japan
Louis C. Megosh United States
Saijuan Chen China
Shiqin Yu United States
Małgorzata Opydo‐Chanek Poland
Amy Coon United States
Imelda T. Sandoval United States
Modesto Carballo Spain
Chad M. Wolf United States
Boxiao Ding United States
John Reed relative to Mei‐yi Pu Japan Mei‐yi Pu's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×12×
Mei‐yi Pu · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by John Reed

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of John Reed's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by John Reed with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites John Reed more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by John Reed

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by John Reed. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by John Reed. The network helps show where John Reed may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside John Reed, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with John Reed Line = papers co-authored together John Reed links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

9 of 9 papers shown
#Work
1 1999265
2 1998135
3 200432
4 200317
5 20238
6 20245
7 20251
8 20141
9 20250

About John Reed

John Reed is a scholar working on Molecular Biology, Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, Oncology, Environmental Chemistry and Hematology, having authored 9 papers that have together received 464 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Prion Diseases and Protein Misfolding (4 papers), Cell death mechanisms and regulation (3 papers), RNA Interference and Gene Delivery (2 papers), Neutrophil, Myeloperoxidase and Oxidative Mechanisms (1 paper), Trace Elements in Health (1 paper), Autoimmune and Inflammatory Disorders Research (1 paper), Nerve injury and regeneration (1 paper) and Retinoids in leukemia and cellular processes (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Environmental Chemistry (54 citations), Molecular Biology (372 citations), Biochemistry (24 citations), Cancer Research (41 citations) and Physiology (11 citations). John Reed has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Chile and France. Frequent co-authors include Isabel Marzo, Guido Kroemer, Nathanaël Larochette, Santos A. Susín, Catherine Brenner, Naoufal Zamzami, Zhihua Xie, Étienne Jacotot, Didier Decaudin and Jason S. Damiano. Their work appears in journals such as International Journal of Oncology, The Journal of Immunology, Experimental Cell Research, mSphere and Oncogene.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact