John Pullen

422 citations
48 papers · 246 · h-index 10

Impact in

Papers in

John Pullen

43 papers receiving 157 citations

Peers

John Pullen
Comparison fields: 5 of 45
  • General Economics, Econometrics and Finance 96
  • Economics and Econometrics 150
  • Sociology and Political Science 165
  • Political Science and International Relations 47
  • History and Philosophy of Science 8
Replace Lionel Robbins with:
Lionel Robbins Canada
Terry Peach United Kingdom
Leticia Arroyo Abad United States
David Chilosi United Kingdom
Clive Trebilcock United States
Ian Duffy United States
Jérôme Sgard France
John Elliott Cairnes
Richard N. Bean United States
Olga Crisp United Kingdom
John Pullen relative to Lionel Robbins Canada Lionel Robbins's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
Lionel Robbins · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by John Pullen

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of John Pullen's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by John Pullen with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites John Pullen more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by John Pullen

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by John Pullen. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by John Pullen. The network helps show where John Pullen may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 4 scholars most cited alongside John Pullen, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with John Pullen Line = papers co-authored together John Pullen links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 48 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 198129
2 198221
3 201018
4 201714
5
The Marginal Productivity Theory of Distribution: A Critical History
200910
6 20099
7 19959
8 19819
9 20069
10 19889
11 20018
12 20136
13 19986
14 20016
15 19715
16 20165
17 19875
18 19784
19 19894
20 19974

About John Pullen

John Pullen is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, General Economics, Econometrics and Finance, Economics and Econometrics, Political Science and International Relations and Law, having authored 48 papers that have together received 246 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Political Economy and Marxism (27 papers), Economic Theory and Policy (27 papers), Economic Theory and Institutions (16 papers), Australian History and Society (4 papers), Historical Economic and Social Studies (3 papers), Property Rights and Legal Doctrine (3 papers), Political Theory and Influence (3 papers) and Land Rights and Reforms (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in General Economics, Econometrics and Finance (96 citations), Economics and Econometrics (150 citations), Sociology and Political Science (165 citations), Political Science and International Relations (47 citations) and History and Philosophy of Science (8 citations). John Pullen has collaborated with scholars based in Australia and United States. Frequent co-authors include Hitoshi Hashimoto, Alan E. Treloar, E. A. Wrigley and Philippa Watson. Their work appears in journals such as History of Political Economy, American Journal of Economics and Sociology, The Economic History Review, Utilitas and Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers Part B Journal of Engineering Manufacture.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact