John Proos

517 citations
6 papers · 352 · h-index 4

Impact in

Papers in

John Proos

6 papers receiving 313 citations

Peers

John Proos
Comparison fields: 5 of 26
  • Artificial Intelligence 319
  • Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition 98
  • Information Systems 100
  • Computational Theory and Mathematics 68
  • Computational Mathematics 2
Replace Herman te Riele with:
Herman te Riele Netherlands
Veronika Kuchta Australia
Nina Bindel Germany
Bruce Dodson United States
HouZhen WANG China
Florian Göpfert Germany
Zvi Gutterman Israel
Marion Videau France
François Arnault France
Thomas Espitau France
John Proos relative to Herman te Riele Netherlands Herman te Riele's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×3.3×
Herman te Riele · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by John Proos

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of John Proos's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by John Proos with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites John Proos more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by John Proos

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by John Proos. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by John Proos. The network helps show where John Proos may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 8 scholars most cited alongside John Proos, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with John Proos Line = papers co-authored together John Proos links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

6 of 6 papers shown
#Work
1 2003224
2 200399
3
Imperfect Decryption and an Attack on the NTRU Encryption Scheme.
200314
4 20188
5
Imperfect decryption and partial information attacks in cryptography
20034
6 20163

About John Proos

John Proos is a scholar working on Computational Theory and Mathematics, Artificial Intelligence, Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Information Systems and Signal Processing, having authored 6 papers that have together received 352 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Cryptography and Data Security (4 papers), Cryptography and Residue Arithmetic (2 papers), Advanced Graph Theory Research (2 papers), Coding theory and cryptography (2 papers), Cryptographic Implementations and Security (2 papers), Chaos-based Image/Signal Encryption (1 paper), Complex Network Analysis Techniques (1 paper) and Complexity and Algorithms in Graphs (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Artificial Intelligence (319 citations), Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (98 citations), Information Systems (100 citations), Computational Theory and Mathematics (68 citations) and Computational Mathematics (2 citations). John Proos has collaborated with scholars based in Canada, France and United States. Frequent co-authors include William Whyte, Joseph H. Silverman, Phong Q. Nguyễn, Nick Howgrave-Graham, David Pointcheval, John J. Healy, Paweł Prałat and Xavier Pérez‐Giménez. Their work appears in journals such as Internet Mathematics, Quantum Information and Computation, Lecture notes in computer science and IACR Cryptology ePrint Archive.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact