Internet Mathematics

217 papers and 6.8k indexed citations

About

The 217 papers published in Internet Mathematics in the last decades have received a total of 6.8k indexed citations. Papers published in Internet Mathematics usually cover Statistical and Nonlinear Physics (147 papers), Computer Networks and Communications (61 papers) and Computational Theory and Mathematics (48 papers) specifically the topics of Complex Network Analysis Techniques (141 papers), Opinion Dynamics and Social Influence (49 papers) and Stochastic processes and statistical mechanics (34 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Internet Mathematics are Michael Mitzenmacher, Andrei Broder, Pavel Berkhin, Fan Chung, Jure Leskovec, Kevin Lang, Michael W. Mahoney, Amy N. Langville, Carl D. Meyer and Anirban Dasgupta.

In The Last Decade

Internet Mathematics

206 papers receiving 6.4k citations

Fields of papers published in Internet Mathematics

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Internet Mathematics. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Internet Mathematics.

Countries where authors publish in Internet Mathematics

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Internet Mathematics. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Internet Mathematics with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Internet Mathematics more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026