John Pope
Impact in
- Urology top 1%
- Urological Disorders and Treatments
- Urinary Bladder and Prostate Research
- Obstetrics and Gynecology top 5%
- Ureteral procedures and complications
Papers in
- Urology 5
- Urological Disorders and Treatments 5
-
- Pediatric Urology and Nephrology Studies 3
- Co-authors
- Michael O. Koch (3 shared papers)Jack S. Elder (1 shared paper)Marc Cendron (1 shared paper)Ellen Shapiro (1 shared paper)Martin A. Koyle (1 shared paper)Saul P. Greenfield (1 shared paper)Anthony A. Caldamone (1 shared paper)Mireya Díaz (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- The Journal of Urology (5 papers)British Journal of Political Science (1 paper)Plant Growth Regulation (1 paper)Journal of Pediatric Urology (1 paper)Applied Clinical Informatics (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United States
In The Last Decade
John Pope
11 papers receiving 362 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 51
- Urology 291
- Obstetrics and Gynecology 157
- Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health 281
- Industrial relations 1
- Political Science and International Relations 41
Countries citing papers authored by John Pope
This map shows the geographic impact of John Pope's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by John Pope with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites John Pope more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by John Pope
This network shows the impact of papers produced by John Pope. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by John Pope. The network helps show where John Pope may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside John Pope, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2006 | 243 | |
| 2 | 1973 | 45 | |
| 3 | Ureteral replacement with reconfigured colon substitute. | 1996 | 30 |
| 4 | 1996 | 28 | |
| 5 | 2016 | 22 | |
| 6 | 2022 | 15 | |
| 7 | 2007 | 3 | |
| 8 | 1996 | 2 | |
| 9 | A linear solution to the n-Queens problem using vector spaces | 2014 | 1 |
| 10 | 2022 | 1 | |
| 11 | 2024 | 1 | |
| 12 | 2007 | 1 | |
| 13 | 2023 | 0 |
About John Pope
John Pope is a scholar working on Urology, Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health, Obstetrics and Gynecology, Surgery and Computer Networks and Communications, having authored 13 papers that have together received 392 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Urological Disorders and Treatments (5 papers), Ureteral procedures and complications (3 papers), Pediatric Urology and Nephrology Studies (3 papers), Pelvic floor disorders treatments (1 paper), Data Management and Algorithms (1 paper), Plant-Microbe Interactions and Immunity (1 paper), Infectious Aortic and Vascular Conditions (1 paper) and Plant nutrient uptake and metabolism (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Urology (291 citations), Obstetrics and Gynecology (157 citations), Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health (281 citations), Industrial relations (1 citation) and Political Science and International Relations (41 citations). John Pope has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Michael O. Koch, Jack S. Elder, Marc Cendron, Ellen Shapiro, Martin A. Koyle, Saul P. Greenfield, Anthony A. Caldamone, Mireya Díaz, Richard S. Hurwitz and Andrew J. Kirsch. Their work appears in journals such as The Journal of Urology, British Journal of Political Science, Plant Growth Regulation, Journal of Pediatric Urology and Applied Clinical Informatics.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.