John Pearson

55 papers receiving 887 citations

Peers

John Pearson
Comparison fields: 5 of 104
  • General Engineering 21
  • Computational Mechanics 281
  • Aerospace Engineering 204
  • Mechanics of Materials 201
  • Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis 93
Replace E. F. C. Somerscales with:
E. F. C. Somerscales United States
P. Cielo Canada
F. Fossati Italy
Cheng Liu China
Ying Xiong China
Xiao Fu China
John M. Stockie Canada
Thomas Brunner United States
A. Kirkpatrick United States
Oleg Iliev Germany
John Pearson relative to E. F. C. Somerscales United States E. F. C. Somerscales's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10×13.3×
E. F. C. Somerscales · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by John Pearson

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of John Pearson's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by John Pearson with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites John Pearson more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by John Pearson

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by John Pearson. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by John Pearson. The network helps show where John Pearson may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside John Pearson, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with John Pearson Line = papers co-authored together John Pearson links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 57 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1
Behavior of Metals Under Impulsive Loads
1965110
2
Explosive Working of Metals
196391
3 201486
4 198880
5 197451
6 199445
7 199844
8 201243
9 200343
10 201243
11 199438
12 201337
13 201235
14
A Fragmentation Model for Cylindrical Warheads
199018
15 200617
16 201814
17 198713
18 195813
19 199412
20 195210

About John Pearson

John Pearson is a scholar working on Mechanical Engineering, Control and Systems Engineering, Civil and Structural Engineering, Computational Mechanics and Aerospace Engineering, having authored 57 papers that have together received 971 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include High-Velocity Impact and Material Behavior (9 papers), Vehicle Dynamics and Control Systems (8 papers), Hydraulic and Pneumatic Systems (7 papers), Railway Engineering and Dynamics (7 papers), Fault Detection and Control Systems (6 papers), Structural Response to Dynamic Loads (5 papers), Atmospheric and Environmental Gas Dynamics (4 papers) and Energetic Materials and Combustion (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in General Engineering (21 citations), Computational Mechanics (281 citations), Aerospace Engineering (204 citations), Mechanics of Materials (201 citations) and Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis (93 citations). John Pearson has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Sweden. Frequent co-authors include John S. Rinehart, R.M. Goodall, Brent W. Webb, Vladimir P. Solovjov, Edwin B. Stear, Daniel Maynes, Roger Dixon, T.X. Mei, Argyrios Zolotas and David D. Laws. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Applied Physics, Journal of Quantitative Spectroscopy and Radiative Transfer, Marine Environmental Research, Vehicle System Dynamics and IEEE Transactions on Semiconductor Manufacturing.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact