John Pearson

58 papers receiving 973 citations

Peers

John Pearson
Comparison fields: 5 of 107
  • General Engineering 23
  • Computational Mechanics 298
  • Mechanics of Materials 233
  • Aerospace Engineering 218
  • Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis 96
Replace Thomas Brunner with:
Thomas Brunner United States
Gangqiang Li China
Cheng Liu China
Franz Mayinger Germany
Zhiwen Huang China
John M. Stockie Canada
A. Kirkpatrick United States
Mohammad Kazemi United States
Oleg Iliev Germany
Isabel Pérez-Grande Spain
John Pearson relative to Thomas Brunner United States Thomas Brunner's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2×2.3×
Thomas Brunner · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by John Pearson

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of John Pearson's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by John Pearson with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites John Pearson more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by John Pearson

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by John Pearson. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by John Pearson. The network helps show where John Pearson may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside John Pearson, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with John Pearson Line = papers co-authored together John Pearson links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 61 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1
Behavior of Metals Under Impulsive Loads
1965127
2
Explosive Working of Metals
1963119
3 201492
4 198886
5 197453
6 200347
7 199447
8 199845
9 201245
10 201243
11 199440
12 201238
13 201338
14 195820
15
A Fragmentation Model for Cylindrical Warheads
199018
16 200617
17 201817
18 198714
19 199413
20 195211

About John Pearson

John Pearson is a scholar working on Mechanical Engineering, Control and Systems Engineering, Materials Chemistry, Civil and Structural Engineering and Computational Mechanics, having authored 61 papers that have together received 1.1k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include High-Velocity Impact and Material Behavior (11 papers), Hydraulic and Pneumatic Systems (8 papers), Vehicle Dynamics and Control Systems (8 papers), Fault Detection and Control Systems (7 papers), Railway Engineering and Dynamics (7 papers), Energetic Materials and Combustion (6 papers), Risk and Safety Analysis (5 papers) and Structural Response to Dynamic Loads (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in General Engineering (23 citations), Computational Mechanics (298 citations), Mechanics of Materials (233 citations), Aerospace Engineering (218 citations) and Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis (96 citations). John Pearson has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Sweden. Frequent co-authors include John S. Rinehart, R.M. Goodall, Brent W. Webb, Vladimir P. Solovjov, Edwin B. Stear, David Woodhead, Daniel Maynes, T.X. Mei, Roger Dixon and Argyrios Zolotas. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Applied Physics, Journal of Quantitative Spectroscopy and Radiative Transfer, Marine Environmental Research, Vehicle System Dynamics and IEEE Transactions on Aerospace and Electronic Systems.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact