John N. Booth

4.6k citations
86 papers · 2.4k · h-index 30

Impact in

Papers in

John N. Booth

83 papers receiving 2.3k citations

Peers

John N. Booth
Comparison fields: 5 of 128
  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine 1.3k
  • Nutrition and Dietetics 359
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 292
  • Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism 305
  • Endocrine and Autonomic Systems 114
Replace Shizukiyo Ishikawa with:
Shizukiyo Ishikawa Japan
Peter Johansson Sweden
Heather M. Johnson United States
Yoichiro Hirakawa Japan
Ernest Vinyoles Spain
Michael Bursztyn Israel
Taku Obara Japan
Pierugo Carbonin Italy
Daiva Rastenytė Lithuania
John N. Booth relative to Shizukiyo Ishikawa Japan Shizukiyo Ishikawa's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.6×
Shizukiyo Ishikawa · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by John N. Booth

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of John N. Booth's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by John N. Booth with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites John N. Booth more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by John N. Booth

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by John N. Booth. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by John N. Booth. The network helps show where John N. Booth may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside John N. Booth, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with John N. Booth Line = papers co-authored together John N. Booth links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 86 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2013124
2 2014103
3 2017103
4 201296
5 201892
6 201489
7 202066
8 201457
9 201656
10 201355
11 201654
12 201853
13 201753
14 201748
15 201145
16 201644
17 201944
18 201642
19 202041
20 201040

About John N. Booth

John N. Booth is a scholar working on Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Nutrition and Dietetics, Physiology and Surgery, having authored 86 papers that have together received 2.4k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Blood Pressure and Hypertension Studies (47 papers), Heart Rate Variability and Autonomic Control (19 papers), Sodium Intake and Health (18 papers), Nutritional Studies and Diet (15 papers), Cardiovascular Health and Risk Factors (13 papers), Cardiovascular Health and Disease Prevention (9 papers), Sleep and related disorders (9 papers) and Obesity, Physical Activity, Diet (7 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine (1.3k citations), Nutrition and Dietetics (359 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (292 citations), Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism (305 citations) and Endocrine and Autonomic Systems (114 citations). John N. Booth has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Canada and Australia. Frequent co-authors include Paul Muntner, Daichi Shimbo, Monika M. Safford, George Howard, Keith M. Diaz, David A. Calhoun, Jacqueline Imperial, Mario Sims, Marwah Abdalla and Plamen D. Penev. Their work appears in journals such as Hypertension, Journal of the American Heart Association, American Journal of Hypertension, Journal of Hypertension and Circulation.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact