John Mester

2.1k citations
35 papers · 528 · h-index 13

Impact in

Papers in

John Mester

33 papers receiving 485 citations

Peers

John Mester
Comparison fields: 5 of 37
  • Condensed Matter Physics 130
  • Astronomy and Astrophysics 178
  • Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics 243
  • Nuclear and High Energy Physics 71
  • Statistical and Nonlinear Physics 60
Replace S. Basak with:
S. Basak India
K.-Y. Choi United States
M. Kuchnir United States
Thomas R. Stevenson United States
S. A. Gregory United States
Amit Yadav United Kingdom
John Tilley United Kingdom
V. Fafone Italy
J. A. Lipa United States
O. Avenel France
John Mester relative to S. Basak India S. Basak's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.1×
S. Basak · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by John Mester

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of John Mester's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by John Mester with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites John Mester more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by John Mester

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by John Mester. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by John Mester. The network helps show where John Mester may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside John Mester, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with John Mester Line = papers co-authored together John Mester links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 35 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1993116
2 200162
3 200034
4 201232
5 200930
6 199129
7 199327
8 199424
9 200722
10 198518
11 200116
12 201515
13 199312
14 200711
15 20009
16 20009
17 19927
18 19927
19 19946
20 19886

About John Mester

John Mester is a scholar working on Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, Astronomy and Astrophysics, Oceanography, Statistical and Nonlinear Physics and Biomedical Engineering, having authored 35 papers that have together received 528 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Quantum, superfluid, helium dynamics (12 papers), Geophysics and Gravity Measurements (7 papers), Cold Atom Physics and Bose-Einstein Condensates (6 papers), Cosmology and Gravitation Theories (5 papers), Superconducting Materials and Applications (4 papers), Atomic and Subatomic Physics Research (4 papers), Ionosphere and magnetosphere dynamics (4 papers) and Advanced Chemical Physics Studies (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Condensed Matter Physics (130 citations), Astronomy and Astrophysics (178 citations), Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics (243 citations), Nuclear and High Energy Physics (71 citations) and Statistical and Nonlinear Physics (60 citations). John Mester has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Italy. Frequent co-authors include P. Worden, J. M. Lockhart, Isaac F. Silvera, J. P. Turneaure, Jianguo Zhu, R. Torii, C. W. F. Everitt, James Overduin, J. G. Brisson and S. Vitale. Their work appears in journals such as Advances in Space Research, Classical and Quantum Gravity, Physical Review Letters, Physica B Condensed Matter and Physical review. B, Condensed matter.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact