John Mester

2.1k citations
31 papers · 488 · h-index 13

Impact in

Papers in

John Mester

31 papers receiving 454 citations

Peers

John Mester
Comparison fields: 5 of 37
  • Condensed Matter Physics 127
  • Astronomy and Astrophysics 151
  • Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics 230
  • Nuclear and High Energy Physics 61
  • Statistical and Nonlinear Physics 50
Replace S. Basak with:
S. Basak India
K.-Y. Choi United States
V. V. Migulin Russia
Thomas R. Stevenson United States
M. Kuchnir United States
John Tilley United Kingdom
S. A. Gregory United States
V. Fafone Italy
J. A. Lipa United States
P. C. Hendry United Kingdom
John Mester relative to S. Basak India S. Basak's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×1.8×
S. Basak · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by John Mester

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of John Mester's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by John Mester with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites John Mester more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by John Mester

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by John Mester. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by John Mester. The network helps show where John Mester may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside John Mester, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with John Mester Line = papers co-authored together John Mester links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 31 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1993113
2 200155
3 200033
4 199129
5 201229
6 200928
7 199326
8 199423
9 200721
10 198516
11 201515
12 200114
13 199312
14 20008
15 20007
16 19927
17 19927
18 19946
19 19886
20 19965

About John Mester

John Mester is a scholar working on Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, Astronomy and Astrophysics, Oceanography, Statistical and Nonlinear Physics and Aerospace Engineering, having authored 31 papers that have together received 488 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Quantum, superfluid, helium dynamics (12 papers), Cold Atom Physics and Bose-Einstein Condensates (6 papers), Geophysics and Gravity Measurements (6 papers), Superconducting Materials and Applications (4 papers), Atomic and Subatomic Physics Research (4 papers), Cosmology and Gravitation Theories (4 papers), Advanced Chemical Physics Studies (3 papers) and Ionosphere and magnetosphere dynamics (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Condensed Matter Physics (127 citations), Astronomy and Astrophysics (151 citations), Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics (230 citations), Nuclear and High Energy Physics (61 citations) and Statistical and Nonlinear Physics (50 citations). John Mester has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Italy. Frequent co-authors include J. M. Lockhart, Isaac F. Silvera, P. Worden, J. P. Turneaure, Jianguo Zhu, R. Torii, James Overduin, C. W. F. Everitt, J. G. Brisson and N. A. Lockerbie. Their work appears in journals such as Advances in Space Research, Classical and Quantum Gravity, Physical Review Letters, Physical review. B, Condensed matter and Physica B Condensed Matter.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact