John Mcleod

74 papers receiving 1.5k citations

Peers

John Mcleod
Comparison fields: 5 of 87
  • Numerical Analysis 239
  • Mathematical Physics 354
  • Statistical and Nonlinear Physics 372
  • Modeling and Simulation 128
  • Applied Mathematics 303
Replace Bernard Friedman with:
Bernard Friedman United States
Changqing Yang China
Anton Arnold Austria
Ruggero María Santilli United States
L. C. Woods United Kingdom
G. L. Lamb United States
G. S. S. Ludford United States
Harold Weitzner United States
Manuel del Pino Chile
Stephen S. Pinsky United States
John Mcleod relative to Bernard Friedman United States Bernard Friedman's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×4.7×
Bernard Friedman · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by John Mcleod

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of John Mcleod's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by John Mcleod with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites John Mcleod more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by John Mcleod

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by John Mcleod. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by John Mcleod. The network helps show where John Mcleod may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside John Mcleod, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with John Mcleod Line = papers co-authored together John Mcleod links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 80 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1980260
2 1987151
3 1962137
4 1989102
5 198194
6 198393
7 199472
8 197852
9 196851
10 198750
11 199641
12 195937
13 196934
14 197427
15 198627
16 201026
17 199725
18 197124
19 199224
20 197024

About John Mcleod

John Mcleod is a scholar working on Applied Mathematics, Computational Mechanics, Electrical and Electronic Engineering, Statistical and Nonlinear Physics and Geometry and Topology, having authored 80 papers that have together received 1.7k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Laser Design and Applications (12 papers), Nonlinear Waves and Solitons (9 papers), Differential Equations and Numerical Methods (9 papers), Fluid Dynamics and Turbulent Flows (9 papers), Laser-Plasma Interactions and Diagnostics (8 papers), Navier-Stokes equation solutions (6 papers), Rheology and Fluid Dynamics Studies (6 papers) and Nonlinear Photonic Systems (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Numerical Analysis (239 citations), Mathematical Physics (354 citations), Statistical and Nonlinear Physics (372 citations), Modeling and Simulation (128 citations) and Applied Mathematics (303 citations). John Mcleod has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Slovakia. Frequent co-authors include S. P. Hastings, Κ. R. Rajagopal, Peter J. Olver, Paul C. Fife, James Serrin, Yisong Yang, Gero Friesecke, E. C. Titchmarsh, Xinfu Chen and John A. Nohel. Their work appears in journals such as The Quarterly Journal of Mathematics, Archive for Rational Mechanics and Analysis, Proceedings of the Royal Society of Edinburgh Section A Mathematics, Laser and Particle Beams and SIAM Journal on Mathematical Analysis.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact