John Marks
Impact in
- Classics top 5%
- Byzantine Studies and History
- Religious studies top 2%
- Biblical Studies and Interpretation
Papers in
-
- Biblical Studies and Interpretation 7
-
- Archaeology and Historical Studies 5
- Historical and Architectural Studies 1
- Co-authors
- H. J. W. Drijvers (1 shared paper)Javier Teixidor (1 shared paper)John Van Seters (1 shared paper)Constantin Boundas (1 shared paper)Dorothea Olkowski (1 shared paper)J. Alberto Soggin (1 shared paper)William D. Davies (1 shared paper)Louis Finkelstein (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- Journal of Biblical Literature (3 papers)Paragraph (2 papers)The American Historical Review (2 papers)IEEE Electrical Insulation Magazine (1 paper)The Modern Language Review (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United Kingdom
In The Last Decade
John Marks
17 papers receiving 231 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 72
- Classics 88
- Religious studies 98
- Archeology 155
- Anthropology 141
- History 57
Countries citing papers authored by John Marks
This map shows the geographic impact of John Marks's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by John Marks with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites John Marks more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by John Marks
This network shows the impact of papers produced by John Marks. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by John Marks. The network helps show where John Marks may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 11 scholars most cited alongside John Marks, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 24 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1981 | 102 | |
| 2 | 1979 | 87 | |
| 3 | 1996 | 65 | |
| 4 | 1984 | 46 | |
| 5 | 1975 | 17 | |
| 6 | 1990 | 11 | |
| 7 | 1985 | 10 | |
| 8 | 1964 | 6 | |
| 9 | 1985 | 2 | |
| 10 | 1986 | 2 | |
| 11 | 2017 | 2 | |
| 12 | 1998 | 1 | |
| 13 | 1975 | 1 | |
| 14 | 1977 | 1 | |
| 15 | 2003 | 1 | |
| 16 | 1977 | 1 | |
| 17 | 1977 | 1 | |
| 18 | 1965 | 1 | |
| 19 | 1985 | 0 | |
| 20 | 2006 | 0 |
About John Marks
John Marks is a scholar working on Religious studies, Archeology, Sociology and Political Science, Philosophy and Political Science and International Relations, having authored 24 papers that have together received 357 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Biblical Studies and Interpretation (7 papers), Archaeology and Historical Studies (5 papers), Philosophy, Ethics, and Existentialism (2 papers), Historical and Architectural Studies (1 paper), Jewish and Middle Eastern Studies (1 paper), Islamic Studies and History (1 paper), Classical Antiquity Studies (1 paper) and Probiotics and Fermented Foods (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Classics (88 citations), Religious studies (98 citations), Archeology (155 citations), Anthropology (141 citations) and History (57 citations). John Marks has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include H. J. W. Drijvers, Javier Teixidor, John Van Seters, Constantin Boundas, Dorothea Olkowski, J. Alberto Soggin, William D. Davies, Louis Finkelstein, Bruce Bernstein and Denis Leigh. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Biblical Literature, Paragraph, The American Historical Review, IEEE Electrical Insulation Magazine and The Modern Language Review.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.